LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old August 15th 04, 01:28 AM
Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:24:14 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith wrote (in
) about 'Error in textbook?',
on Sat, 14 Aug 2004:

Unfortunately, boiling the CFC also distilled it, leaving any
contamination on the chips.


Sulfur hexafluoride might have been better, but it's probably more
costly than CFCs were.


Cost? Dunno. I do know that we were paying $50/qt (IIRC) for the stuff
in '75. I wouldn't think a sulfur/fluoride brew could be made any
"cleaner" than CFCs. THe problem was the contaminants.

--
Keith
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017