Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:24:14 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith wrote (in ) about 'Error in textbook?', on Sat, 14 Aug 2004: Unfortunately, boiling the CFC also distilled it, leaving any contamination on the chips. Sulfur hexafluoride might have been better, but it's probably more costly than CFCs were. Cost? Dunno. I do know that we were paying $50/qt (IIRC) for the stuff in '75. I wouldn't think a sulfur/fluoride brew could be made any "cleaner" than CFCs. THe problem was the contaminants. -- Keith |