Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim" wrote in message ...
This other method involves measuring the gain of the device under test and then measuring the noise power output with the input terminated properly ....any errors in the measurement can easily outnumber the actual noise figure Thanks for reminding me of that one, Jim. But I see your point about errors. For example, in measuring the gain one needs a standard. One of the few pieces of real test gear I have is a bolometer-type RF power meter which can measure about -13 dBm accurately. If the measurement bandwidth is 1 MHz (suitable for VHF, perhaps) then thermal noise is -114 dBm. So I need about 100 dB gain for a very low noise figure DUT. To measure that I might need five 20 dB attenuators as a standard, each with perhaps +/-0.5 dB accuracy if I am lucky...so there's +/-2.5 dB error (well, I suppose I could cross my fingers and RSS the numbers). Or I have a diode-type power meter that will measure lower power, which leads to issues of how the detector responds to noise. And then there's the problem of knowing the noise bandwidth precisely... is where half my gray hairs came from (the other half from being laid off). I think about half of mine come from the latter factor too ! If you are measuring an entire receiver there are a few things you have to be careful with. The receiver must be a linear receiver (no FM, AM diode detector, etc.---basically just SSB). There should be a filter to pick just one sideband. Turn the AGC off. Make sure you measure the gain in the linear region, which also applies to a simple amplifier. Definitely. Though, with my method the input never gets more than 3 dB above the receiver noise floor and in most cases a well designed receiver will have no AGC response at that level. But with a preamp in front it usually will activate the AGC, so AGC has to be switched off when comparing preamps - which of course is impossible to do in most ham rigs ! If you have a DUT with a known noise figure, I think that this would be one way of calibrating a homebrew noise source. Hence the interest in NF repeatability of MMIC amps, since they are hard to build wrong, are well matched over a wide bandwidth and don't require tuning for best noise figure. The known DUT can also be the standard itself (in association with a receiver of only roughly known NF) to avoid issues of errors in calibrating the noise source ENR. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need a low noise VXO for narrow sweep | Homebrew | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |