Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The idea was to measure the coated resistor under exactly the same
conditions as the regular one, so couldn't you just use exactly the same setup as before? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Ian White, G3SEK wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: Ian, if it's not too much trouble, I'd be very interested in how the measured inductance compares to that of the resistor body/leads only. I'd think that could be done by coating a similar-size resistor with conductive paint or foil and measuring with the same method. The difference between this measurement and the one you made would then show how much inductance is due to the spiral element, and would represent the minimum possible inductance for that resistor body type and lead length. I could certainly do that, because Duncan has supplied pairs of resistors: one in original condition, and the other with the coating cleaned off, just ready for painting. However, the difference in inductance is going to be very small, and I'd need to build a test jig that can keep other stray inductances under control. Over the weekend, maybe... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
The idea was to measure the coated resistor under exactly the same conditions as the regular one, so couldn't you just use exactly the same setup as before? Afraid not... In the present setup, the main contribution to the total inductance comes from the long, floppy resistor wires, and I couldn't guarantee not to disturb their configuration while applying conductive paint to the resistor. To get a reliable answer, I'd need to reduce the lead length and make the whole thing mechanically more stable. Ian White, G3SEK wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: Ian, if it's not too much trouble, I'd be very interested in how the measured inductance compares to that of the resistor body/leads only. I'd think that could be done by coating a similar-size resistor with conductive paint or foil and measuring with the same method. The difference between this measurement and the one you made would then show how much inductance is due to the spiral element, and would represent the minimum possible inductance for that resistor body type I could certainly do that, because Duncan has supplied pairs of resistors: one in original condition, and the other with the coating cleaned off, just ready for painting. However, the difference in inductance is going to be very small, and I'd need to build a test jig that can keep other stray inductances under control. Over the weekend, maybe... -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: carbon comp resistors 1/2watt | Boatanchors | |||
non-inductive resistors: metal-film vs carbon ? | Antenna | |||
FS - H/D METAL HOUSED RESISTORS 250w/100w | Boatanchors | |||
FS - H/D METAL HOUSED RESISTORS 250w/100w | Boatanchors |