| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , "William E. Sabin"
writes: My receiver has a custom made, computer printed scale using a calibrated sig gen, and there are two trimpot adjustments, one for the low end and one for the high end. This circuit uses voltage regulated opamps. The S meter dynamics are adjusted using RC time constants. My S meter is accurate within +/- 2 dB from 160 M to 10 M, because the receiver is designed for this accuracy. Because of the IF and RF circuit design, the scale calibration is fairly correct and reliable, as I mentioned. Bill W0IYH Thanks, Bill. I'm doing essentially the same...and expect the overall receiver response to the flat within +/- 1 db within an octave and a half tuning range. Accuracy of the S-Meter is only as good as the RF level accuracy of the calibrating RF source but that's another task and I have confidence in that. But, I have to start someplace and that is why I asked about a "standard." I know that the U.S. military didn't bother with any receiver S-Meter calibration standards since around 1980, only approximate differential signal strength readings if there was an indicator at all. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| SWR meter calibration question - hooked up backwards? | Equipment | |||
| SWR meter calibration question - hooked up backwards? | Antenna | |||
| inline swr meter question | Antenna | |||
| 10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
| Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||