Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 7th 05, 04:05 PM
Andrew VK3BFA
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Alan Peake wrote:
I consider this to be the definitive reason why beeswax is a better
potting material for VCO's.

What more do you want? - its cheap, readily available, easy to use,
recyclable, easy to get out for equipment maintenance, smells ok when
melted (better than modern chemicals) - need I say more?

Andrew VK3BFA

Andrew, do you know what the thermal conductivity of beeswax is?
Alan


Nope. Is it remotely relevant to this application?

Andrew VK3BFA

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 8th 05, 09:46 AM
Alan Peake
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Andrew, do you know what the thermal conductivity of beeswax is?
Alan



Nope. Is it remotely relevant to this application?

Andrew VK3BFA


It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the
various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses,
thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. So it helps to
have everything thermally connected so all component values change at
the same rate.
If beeswax conducts heat well, then potting the oscillator with it would
assist temperature stability.
Alan


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 8th 05, 03:01 PM
Al
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Alan Peake wrote:

Andrew, do you know what the thermal conductivity of beeswax is?
Alan



Nope. Is it remotely relevant to this application?

Andrew VK3BFA


It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the
various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses,
thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. So it helps to
have everything thermally connected so all component values change at
the same rate.
If beeswax conducts heat well, then potting the oscillator with it would
assist temperature stability.
Alan



The beeswax also stabilizes the components so they don't vibrate for
whatever reason. Vibrations can induce changes in values for susceptible
components resulting in modulation of the output frequency.

Al
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 8th 05, 08:28 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Peake wrote:

It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the
various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses,
thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. . .


This is one of several reasons that the best approach in designing an
oscillator -- or any other temperature sensitive circuit -- is to use
components that each have as small a temperature coefficient as
possible. That is, first minimize the inherent drift. Then, if you must,
compensate what drift remains.

Roy Lewallen
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017