Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew, do you know what the thermal conductivity of beeswax is? Alan Nope. Is it remotely relevant to this application? Andrew VK3BFA It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses, thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. So it helps to have everything thermally connected so all component values change at the same rate. If beeswax conducts heat well, then potting the oscillator with it would assist temperature stability. Alan |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Alan Peake wrote: Andrew, do you know what the thermal conductivity of beeswax is? Alan Nope. Is it remotely relevant to this application? Andrew VK3BFA It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses, thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. So it helps to have everything thermally connected so all component values change at the same rate. If beeswax conducts heat well, then potting the oscillator with it would assist temperature stability. Alan The beeswax also stabilizes the components so they don't vibrate for whatever reason. Vibrations can induce changes in values for susceptible components resulting in modulation of the output frequency. Al |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Peake wrote:
It could be. One problem with temperature compensation is that the various components of an oscillator have differing thermal masses, thermal conductivities and hence thermal time constants. . . This is one of several reasons that the best approach in designing an oscillator -- or any other temperature sensitive circuit -- is to use components that each have as small a temperature coefficient as possible. That is, first minimize the inherent drift. Then, if you must, compensate what drift remains. Roy Lewallen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|