Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whatever you say about your K2, it is a proprietary design,
and thus no different from the YaesKenIcom products, and therefore is off-the-shelf The essence of Ham Radio is that we produce and maintain our own designs and are not beholden to any commercial operation that has its sights set on the shekels. I'm not interested in a comparison with commercial gear. The idea is to design a transceiver that is easily reproducible by beginners, and which is future-proofed by having the interface between stages well-specified so that you could, for example, substitute your own mixing stages. "gb" wrote in message ... "Airy R.Bean" wrote in message ... I'm not proposing anything like that. I don't know anything about the K2. You seem to have missed the point somewhat, if your thoughts go straight to what you can buy off the shelf. Not "off the shelf" product. I am very surprised that you are unaware of Elecraft (founded in 1998) by Wayne Burdick (N6KR) and Eric Swartz (WA6HHQ). They are the design team dedicated to "hands-on" ham radio transceivers and accessories that can easily be built by amateurs. I don't follow URL's from Usenet - it is a bad debating style to send your correspondents off to do reading. if you have something of value to say, then please say it yourself. I guess you do not read hobby print magazine or had a contact with an Elecraft user. Elecraft (and its concept) of building and reparing your won equipment has been widely covered in amateur print magazines in Europe, Far East and US. Debating is not the point and usenet is not the forum for true debate. Compare your stated specifications and criteria to the Elecraft K2 design team's criteria and specs --- you shoudl discover that it meets the majority of your stated criteria. gb "Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... .....is that we club together and conceive of a design for an HF transceiver that could form the basis of the station of any budding Radio Ham. We wouldn't need any facilities other than were present in, say, the KW2000 of 35 years ago (apart from greater than 200 kHz coverage on each band!) None of the CBer's facilities such as scanners, memories, CAT interfaces, CTCSS and the like are necessary. I suggest that we consider a DSP approach for all the baseband mod and demod, and then phasing techniques for translating into the various bands. A power output of 5W will be more than sufficient for any self-respecting _REAL_ Radio Hams - it is only CBers and CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams who need to work with BBC levels of signal strength. Such a project could be what we need to capture the interest of newcomers who would not then be sidetracked into the CB-like purchasing of brand-new rigs from the shelves of emporia, and, having, constructed their own rigs, would feel competent to maintain those rigs, unlike those who send them back to the emporia and thus show themselves as closet CBers. We _COULD_ take a lead in this NG! ... and your thoughts on the existing Elecraft K2 (which meetings you power output criteria), which has almost 5,000 kits of this model now sold worldwide? http://www.elecraft.com/ Do you desire to build upon this kit and building experience (referred to as "K3" designs among Elecraft builders) by adding additional features you have mentioned? gb |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
MAKE 5000.00 PER WEEK | Antenna | |||
fa= Hams Like Cameras also>>VIVITAR V335 35mm CAMERA BODY | Equipment | |||
fa= Hams Like Cameras also>>VIVITAR V335 35mm CAMERA BODY | Equipment |