Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:35:11 +0800, budgie wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 Feb 2005 09:42:58 -500, "Asimov" wrote: "budgie" bravely wrote to "All" (16 Feb 05 12:52:14) --- on the heady topic of " Something like a diplexer" bu From: budgie bu Xref: aeinews rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:2181 You missed a step called a directional coupler. It's a sort of transformer with 2 input ports and 1 output port. The 2 inputs don't see one another but their power is combined at the output. bu You don't actually *need* a directional coupler. I have seen window bu preselectors with five separate sections for sub-bands between 403 and bu 520 MHz. The configuration is symmetrical (in/out) with simple bandpass bu filter segments and coaxial split/combine harnesses. Not a DC or bu hybrid in sight. I am presuming - not having swept one - that at "off" bu frequencies each parallelled leg presents a high enough impedance to bu the split junction that the effect is negligible. Yes but it requires some effort and cost to build the 2nd BP filters so I wonder if it's any more difficult to do either? What do you figure? I'm not sure we are on the same wavelength here (no pun intended). For *non-overlapping* filter sections, the bandsplit through two bandpass sections 25-500 and say 550-3000 should be able to be achieved with T-pieces at the input and output ends (although it appears the O/P didn't achieve this). I am not sure exactly what is trying to be accomplished here but if it is to combine two different bandpass filters then yes a T. The cable from the low pass filter to the T should be a quarter wave length at the frequency of the high pass filter. The cable from the high pass filter to the T should then be a quarter wave length of the low pass filter. The low pass filter will look like a short circuit at the high pass frequency. With the quarter wave length cable that short circuit will then be transformed to a very high impedance to the hi pass circuit. That effectively isolates one from the other. Do the another T and cable setup at the input and output. 73 Gary K4FMX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Link to tutorial on diplexer design | Homebrew | |||
Link to tutorial on diplexer design | Homebrew | |||
T2DF + diplexer = HF + LF coverage, AM BC rejection | Antenna | |||
FS: Diamond MX-72N Diplexer | Swap | |||
FS: Diamond MX-72N Diplexer | Swap |