Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shielded inductors -- why do they work so well?
I've noticed that the various tunable inductors (and transformers) in a metal
can are much better shielded than I might have initially guessed, based upon the premise that most all of the flux from the coil in concentrated inside the coil which is 'visible' through the hole in the can (so that the thing can be tuned!). In thinking about this, I've pretty much convinced myself that the shielding works as well as it does because electrically it still "looks" pretty much contiguous at the frequencies you're typically operating the coil at (e.g., tens of MHz for a 1/4" hole), in a similar manner to how perforated enclosures make an effective shield so long as the holes are small enough (...and how you can even calculate the attenuation based on "waveguide below cutoff" formulas). Is that correct? If so, it seems that if you tune the slug so far "out" that it protrudes from the top of the can, you're probably starting to seriously degrade the shielding... right? Thanks, ---Joel Kolstad |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to work satelites? | General | |||
Best Home Base Work | Homebrew | |||
Best Home Base Work | General | |||
Some thoughts about homebrew inductors | Homebrew | |||
Snap-on choke hurts shielded loop | Antenna |