Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 07:47 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default No progress in decades...

Decades have brought us moon landing, mars landings,masers, lasers, lets,
fets, mosfets, computers, etc...

But the shape of radio equip. has remained virtually stagnant.

One "innovation" would be to just copy what the IBM clone has taught us.

Build a radio of "cards." Just like the computer, a standard case which you
can plugin various power supplies, frontend board "cards", intermediate
board "cards", buffer amp board "cards", IF board "cards", audio board
"cards", xmitter board "cards", final amp board "cards", etc.... I think
you get the pic

One radio case can/could virtually be any radio you can imagine.... new
design in a frontend? Plug in a new front end "card", new audio offering?
Plug in a new audio board "card."

Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?

Warmest regards,
John

--
I AM ONE-IN-A-MILLION!!!!!
Too bad the other 999,999 got there first.. frown


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 09:31 AM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Smith wrote:
. . .
Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?


I sure seem to hear that a lot.

Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.

Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical
know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
being lazy?

Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 09:39 AM
atec
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Smith wrote:

. . .
Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?



I sure seem to hear that a lot.

Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.

Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical
know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
being lazy?

Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?

So it would appear is attacking another's comment .

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

  #4   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 02:57 PM
Wes Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote:

Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Smith wrote:

. . .
Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?



I sure seem to hear that a lot.

Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.

Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical
know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
being lazy?

Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?

So it would appear is attacking another's comment .


Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired
of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any
software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental
filter.


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 03:01 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I just hope you are not getting to the point of contemplating
"Un-American Activities", you still support free speech--don't you?

Warmest regards,
John
--
I AM ONE-IN-A-MILLION!!!!!
Too bad the other 999,999 got there first.. frown

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
| On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote:
|
| Roy Lewallen wrote:
| John Smith wrote:
|
| . . .
| Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!
|
| Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?
|
|
| I sure seem to hear that a lot.
|
| Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.
|
| Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the
technical
| know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
| being lazy?
|
| Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
| isn't it?
| So it would appear is attacking another's comment .
|
| Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired
| of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any
| software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental
| filter.
|
|




  #6   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 07:23 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wes Stewart wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote:


Roy Lewallen wrote:

John Smith wrote:


. . .
Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?


I sure seem to hear that a lot.

Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.

Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical
know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
being lazy?

Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?


So it would appear is attacking another's comment .



Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired
of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any
software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental
filter.


You might want to check out the idea of filtering. Cleans up the
newsgroups right fine.

- Mike KB3EIA -
  #7   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 07:51 PM
Wes Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:23:22 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:

Wes Stewart wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote:


Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired
of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any
software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental
filter.


You might want to check out the idea of filtering. Cleans up the
newsgroups right fine.


I use Free Agent. It doesn't do filtering, but as I said, I turn on my
mental filter that says, "When you see a post by 'John Smith'", ignore
it. I used the same filter for "Fractenna." Works fine.


  #8   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 01:37 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Smith wrote:

. . .
Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!!

Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it?



I sure seem to hear that a lot.

Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it.

Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical
know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By
being lazy?

Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?


Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it?

- Mike KB3EIA -
  #9   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 02:33 PM
Harold E. Johnson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying,
isn't it?


Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it?

- Mike KB3EIA -


Considering what has gone before, it's unduly tame.

W4ZCB


  #10   Report Post  
Old May 8th 05, 08:23 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Coslo wrote:

Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it?

- Mike KB3EIA -


I do tend to be that way. And because of the couple of negative comments
about my posting I've thought it over a fair amount to see if, on
reflection, I think it was out of line.

But I don't think so, unless I mininterpreted what "John Smith" said.
What he seemed to be saying is that he has this great idea, and the only
reason it's not being impelemented is that *the other people* are too
lazy to do it.

As one of the "other people", I find it kind of insulting. Do you really
think his is a valid point of view, that everyone else should jump up
and implement his great idea, while this anonymous person's job is to
tell us what we should do?

I really do think that a caustic comment was appropriate.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any GE Progress Line Units Still Around? Jim Knoll Boatanchors 3 November 13th 08 09:15 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 April 30th 04 05:50 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 April 30th 04 05:48 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews General 0 April 30th 04 05:47 PM
Why do hams always stand in the way of progress? SouthDakotaRadio Scanner 12 March 14th 04 02:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017