Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Decades have brought us moon landing, mars landings,masers, lasers, lets,
fets, mosfets, computers, etc... But the shape of radio equip. has remained virtually stagnant. One "innovation" would be to just copy what the IBM clone has taught us. Build a radio of "cards." Just like the computer, a standard case which you can plugin various power supplies, frontend board "cards", intermediate board "cards", buffer amp board "cards", IF board "cards", audio board "cards", xmitter board "cards", final amp board "cards", etc.... I think you get the pic One radio case can/could virtually be any radio you can imagine.... new design in a frontend? Plug in a new front end "card", new audio offering? Plug in a new audio board "card." Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? Warmest regards, John -- I AM ONE-IN-A-MILLION!!!!! Too bad the other 999,999 got there first.. frown |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
. . . Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? I sure seem to hear that a lot. Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By being lazy? Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Smith wrote: . . . Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? I sure seem to hear that a lot. Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By being lazy? Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? So it would appear is attacking another's comment . Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: John Smith wrote: . . . Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? I sure seem to hear that a lot. Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By being lazy? Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? So it would appear is attacking another's comment . Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental filter. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I just hope you are not getting to the point of contemplating
"Un-American Activities", you still support free speech--don't you? Warmest regards, John -- I AM ONE-IN-A-MILLION!!!!! Too bad the other 999,999 got there first.. frown "Wes Stewart" wrote in message ... | On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote: | | Roy Lewallen wrote: | John Smith wrote: | | . . . | Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! | | Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? | | | I sure seem to hear that a lot. | | Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. | | Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical | know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By | being lazy? | | Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, | isn't it? | So it would appear is attacking another's comment . | | Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired | of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any | software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental | filter. | | |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: John Smith wrote: . . . Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? I sure seem to hear that a lot. Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By being lazy? Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? So it would appear is attacking another's comment . Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental filter. You might want to check out the idea of filtering. Cleans up the newsgroups right fine. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:23:22 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote: Wes Stewart wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:39:36 +1000, atec wrote: Perhaps it is because Roy is, like your's truly, getting a bit tired of seeing "John Smith's" conversations with himself. I don't use any software filters on my newsreader but I've sure engaged a mental filter. You might want to check out the idea of filtering. Cleans up the newsgroups right fine. I use Free Agent. It doesn't do filtering, but as I said, I turn on my mental filter that says, "When you see a post by 'John Smith'", ignore it. I used the same filter for "Fractenna." Works fine. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
John Smith wrote: . . . Someone really should get off a dead duff somewhere and DO IT!!!! Kinda makes ya wonder why not? Doesn't it? I sure seem to hear that a lot. Some *other* lazy bum oughtta get off his duff and do it. Why don't you do it? If the problem is that you don't have the technical know-how, well, how do you think those people who have it, got it? By being lazy? Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it? - Mike KB3EIA - |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Typing a few sentences and hitting Send sure is easier than studying, isn't it? Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it? - Mike KB3EIA - Considering what has gone before, it's unduly tame. W4ZCB |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote:
Yoiks, Roy! That was a little caustic wasn't it? - Mike KB3EIA - I do tend to be that way. And because of the couple of negative comments about my posting I've thought it over a fair amount to see if, on reflection, I think it was out of line. But I don't think so, unless I mininterpreted what "John Smith" said. What he seemed to be saying is that he has this great idea, and the only reason it's not being impelemented is that *the other people* are too lazy to do it. As one of the "other people", I find it kind of insulting. Do you really think his is a valid point of view, that everyone else should jump up and implement his great idea, while this anonymous person's job is to tell us what we should do? I really do think that a caustic comment was appropriate. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Any GE Progress Line Units Still Around? | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | General | |||
Why do hams always stand in the way of progress? | Scanner |