LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old July 17th 05, 10:56 PM
xpyttl
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ian White G/GM3SEK" wrote in message
...

For something like a receiver tuning control, even 256 steps/rev would
sound 'jumpy'. However, you could gear it up mechanically so that even a


Actually, 256 is getting too high in most cases. The "jumpiness" comes from
the size of the step, i.e., the number of Hz per step. Encoders between 50
and 100 are probably the easiest to deal with. You generally want to make
the step size small, like 1 or 10 Hz, but you don't want hundreds of turns
to cover the band. At very high resolutions, the pulses can come very fast,
so it gets tricky to distinguish the closure from noise. Of course,
higher counts can be made to work, and in principle, can be made to work
better. But generally, one is dealing with low level software and finite
compute resources to read the encoder, so the very high resolutions can
actually become somewhat problematic.

...


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' Mike Coslo Policy 24 July 22nd 04 05:50 AM
Drake R8B Encoder Question mike0219116 Shortwave 18 July 3rd 04 03:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017