| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Additional cons:
- Increased noise from the regeneration - Potential for distortion introducted by the regeneration - Non-flattopped response because of the single resonator (so you need to make the resonance broad enough that you can do a decent job with another filter, likely at a lower frequency) - To get high Q with reasonable regeneration still requires a BIG resonator (at VHF). High regeneration is difficult to make stable. I'd enjoy reading about the results of your experiments with this, but I honestly don't have high expectations for its being practical. A long time ago, I worked on a receiver that applied gated regeneration to the energy introduced into a cavity by an antenna, up in the several GHz region, and it was a sensitive design for a very specific purpose that worked well with few parts. But that design was optimized to accomplish a special task, and the design approach was appropriate for that task. Cheers, Tom |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FS: UHF Duplexers and Cavity | Swap | |||
| FS: Icom RP-2210 repeater with 4 cavity duplexer | Equipment | |||
| FS: Icom RP-2210 repeater with 4 cavity duplexer | Equipment | |||
| Fuel Tanks and Cereal Silos as Cavity Resonators for HF | Homebrew | |||
| Fuel Tanks and Cereal Silos as Cavity Resonators for HF | Homebrew | |||