LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 11th 05, 02:28 PM
William E. Sabin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tim Shoppa" wrote in message
oups.com...
AM wide 12-16khz
Am narrow 6-10khz


Maybe it's my aging male ears but I've never heard an AM transmission
where a 10kHz filter was needed or even desirable. Whenever I switch
on the wider filter I just hear more hiss and static, and no more
fidelity.


In my homebrew receiver (see QRZ.COM), for SSB reception using headphones, I
toggle-switch in a modified audio response increase in the upper range of
speech frequencies, 3 dB at 3000 Hz. This greatly improves speech
intelligibility at low audio volume, and this saves my aging ears from
overload, especially when listening to weak signals. It is important to
protect hearing, at any age.

Bill W0IYH


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to measure soil constants at HF Reg Edwards Antenna 104 June 25th 05 10:46 PM
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver RHF Shortwave 7 January 4th 05 03:00 AM
Constant bandwidth TRF circuit John Byrns Shortwave 6 June 14th 04 01:55 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE http://CBC.am/ Shortwave 0 July 16th 03 08:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017