Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Polymath" wrote...
Because although CBers are in a different intellectual class to Radio Hams, it is neither my wish to insult them nor to enter into a discourse with them. NO... It IS your intention to insult them, just behind their backs so you run less risk of them replying. Your post was not really intended as an "FAQ", it was purely a relatively "safe" release for your personal anger. Wuss. CBers have the right to besport their habits in the appropriate place as do all the lower classes, which in this context is rrcb (and urrcb). If you must start seeing this as a class system, look up "Amateur" in a dictionary. Please consider the meaning of the word before suggesting that an "Amateur" is above the professionals who design and build equipment to the standards set by Governments, standards far above that required by an *amateur* producing equipment for his own personal use. A CB Radio hobbyist, on the other hand, sees no difference between a Ham Radio licence and a CB Radio licence. To him, they are sisters-under-the-skin. Wrongly, the CB Radio Hobbyist then tries to classify himself as the equal of the Radio Ham when, in fact, he is nothing of the kind. A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme. -----ooooo----- One group of people who claim to be of the standard of Radio Hams but who are in reality nothing more than an apology for the failure of a CBer are those class B licensees who falsely proclaimed that they were against the use of a Morse Test to control access to the HF bands, until, that is, a test was introduced at their intellectual level, the intellectual level of 6-year-olds. 6 year-olds simply lack the mathematical tool kit to enable them to handle even the simplest algebraic manipulation for Ohm's Law and thus, the disgraceful Class Ber's in the aforementioned category are not Radio Hams by any stretch of the imagination! Comparing, as you call them, "disgraceful Class Ber's" to 6 year old children is clearly intended to insult people. Please think before displaying such ignorance and stupidity by blaming CBers for the rules... they have absolutely NO CONTROL over such matters. CBers neither set the rules nor claim to represent "members", that woukld be Ofcom and the RSGB. CBers do NOT see Amateur and CB as "sisters", it is people like the RSGB, the RA and Ofcom and a certain magazine publisher who see it that way and make decisions to mix, combine and change rules and formats. Any sensible CBer would prefer to keep Amateur and CB separate, as they are separate services for totally different purposes. If you must get so angry, do yourself a couple of favours... 1. Blame and whine at the correct people, those able to make the changes. 2. Watch your blood pressure, OM. I agree with keeping the Amateur requirements higher. I agree that it is now too simple, and has been for some years. I believe that Amateur radio should be for those with a real interest in radio, and tests should be set to allow those people through - not to get the licence figures up. But it's pointless blaming people for taking what is on offer, sitting the test required to get their licence. Regards, Peter. |