Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
Hi Dave, "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... One of the recipes for making stable, friendly, and reproducible designs at RF seems to be to minimize the impact of parasitic reactances. Certainly true, although my feeling is that 'ugly' construction above a ground plane creates _well controlled_ parasitics that tend not to change much based on, e.g., waving your hand above the PCB, mounting the PCB close to a metal chassis, etc. My experience is that the most common and troublesome parasitic reactance in modern solid-state circuitry is, by far, the inductance of the ground system. And that's just where "ugly" construction shines -- it makes that inductance as small as possible. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter | Swap | |||
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna | Antenna | |||
Grounding Rod | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |