LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old January 5th 06, 04:04 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ground Plane construction vs pre-printed "protoboards"

Joel Kolstad wrote:
Hi Dave,

"Dave Platt" wrote in message
...

One of the recipes for making stable, friendly, and reproducible
designs at RF seems to be to minimize the impact of parasitic
reactances.



Certainly true, although my feeling is that 'ugly' construction above a ground
plane creates _well controlled_ parasitics that tend not to change much based
on, e.g., waving your hand above the PCB, mounting the PCB close to a metal
chassis, etc.


My experience is that the most common and troublesome parasitic
reactance in modern solid-state circuitry is, by far, the inductance of
the ground system. And that's just where "ugly" construction shines --
it makes that inductance as small as possible.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
FS: sma-to-bnc custom fit rubber covered antenna adapter Stephen G. Gulyas Swap 17 December 7th 04 06:42 PM
ground plane for a magnetic mount cellular antenna isaac Antenna 7 July 13th 04 04:51 PM
Grounding Rod Alan J Giddings Shortwave 21 January 21st 04 10:10 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017