Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:21:19 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:
As a generalization, I think that any circuit that excites the crystal's series resonant mode will probably outperform a circuit that excites the parallel resonant mode, because the series resonance is higher Q and is less affected by external influences. Joe, a minor issue. Frerking,"Crystal Oscillator Design and Temperature Compensation" (and a lot of other folks) says the Q of the crystal is: Q = Xl / R, where Xl is the motional inductance and R is the ESR. Thus the Q of the -crystal- is not a function of the mode of operation. Short of drastically changing R, the crystal Q is unaffected by external circuitry. If we speak of overall -circuit- Q then that is a different can of worms. Joe W3JDR "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... JJ wrote: I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ AFAIK a well-designed Butler oscillator will have the lowest jitter, but I doubt that you could do the "well designed" part without a lot of bench work. Any of the rest (considering a "Clapp" oscillator to mean a crystal oscillator with rubbering) are good enough for communications work. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crystal VCO | Homebrew | |||
Crystal VCO | Homebrew | |||
Pulling crystal | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew |