Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Magnum wrote:
How are beginners expected to "put themselves out? when the only way to "hammery" is through the M3 direction? They can take the tests as that is the route they have to take. But they certainly don't have to lower themselves to actually applying for an M3 callsign! Maybe they could take one of the TWO all day sessions that Brian mentioned and go straight to a Full licence. It's just a shame this facility isn't offered ALL the time. Brian still hasn't given a good answer as to why that facility isn't available ALL the time! To be proud of yes but jealously guarded? How are you going to guard it... by demanding Morse be set at 20-30 WPM in_all_classes of "Hammery" That would be a good start. At least we'd get rid of a lot of the chaff that has no intention of progressing up the so-called progressive licensing scheme (a.k.a. an M3 licensee of more than one year). If there had been a 20-30wpm Morse test when they got their M3 farce licence, then they would never have bothered and Amateur Radio would have been a better place as a result. Just like CB, I remember the fox-hunts we had in the late 70's - early 80's and what fun they were too. I remember also the joys of DX on 11 metres, especially the competitions and the sense of achievement in contacting those far away stations. Seems the two hobbies are similar after all... (How dare I make that comparison eh...) Just curious.... was that 11M DXing on SSB? Can't really see what excitement there would be trying to DX with 4W of FM! No disagreement there... CB radio was devised originally as a "service" for the community to keep in local touch with each other. So, why were you DXing on it if it is only to be used as a local service? Please state how many 6 yr olds hold an M3 or any other radio licence. We have been asking Brian and the RSGB to release these non-personal stats for ages but for some reason they always avoid the question. Brian says he would be uncomfortable doing so himself, so why doesn't he with his Board position of "Amateur Radio Development" within RSGB Ltd get them published in RadCom. There really is no good reason why these stats cannot be published unless they are trying to hide something. Another interesting stat would be the percentage of M3s that have progressed any further!! All because they weren't interested in Morse code, that antiquated communication method pre-dating last century and rarely used now apart from by a few 'die hard' Amateurs. You obviously don't listen to the HF bands much then! Morse code is alive and well and is being used by a LOT of people. Take just about any recent DXpedition in the past few years and look at the breakdown of the QSOs regarding CW v SSB. Usually the CW totals are far ahead of the SSB totals. "Rarely used".... you have no idea what you are talking about! Or maybe you just hear all those funny noises at the low ends of the bands and as you don't understand Morse code you are prejudiced against it. Just a wild guess ![]() Remember - A sure sign of a CB Radio hobbyist is if he holds, or has ever held, a licence issued under the gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme! No need to comment further here... Why? Do you agree? You've commented on everything else you disagreed with! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |