Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:47:14 GMT, biascomms
wrote: Gary Schafer wrote: Cathode modulation is very similar to grid modulation in performance. After all audio is placed between the grid and cathode just the same as it is with conventional grid modulation. The amount of cathode to plate modulation is minimal. Correct, and the distortion can be pretty nasty, too. Screen modulation is similar in performance to grid modulation also. Efficiency is around 35% carrier efficiency. Very tricky to tune up properly. It was the /only/ type of AM I used at first, as I was unable to get big mod transformers. It worked well enough, though it was difficult to get close to 100% mod. Lots of envelope feedback cured the non-linearity distortions. Low level modulation with a linear amplifier behind the modulated driver also has an efficiency of around 35%. Excellent AM can be generated this way as is done with some SSB transmitters in the AM mode. If properly set up one can not tell the difference between it and a high level plate modulated transmitter except that the plate modulated transmitter will probably have higher distortion. Low-level mod with a linear is very inefficient (with respect to DC input), but is sometimes the only really practical way to proceed. Again, lots of envelope feedback can sort out the distortions caused by less than perfect PAs! Bob Plate modulated transmitters are not all that low distortion in general. It is much easier to get a very clean low distortion AM signal by doing it at low levels and amplifying with a linear amp, provided the amplifier is run properly. At low levels modulation can be done with class A modulation stages as opposed to typical class B high level modulators and non linear modulation transformers. Even with 33% carrier efficiency of the linear amp the total amount of AC power required from the power company isn't much different. With the linear amp there are no large modulator tube filaments to light, screen, bias and plate supplies to run the modulator. With the new FCC rules limiting the peak envelope power to 1500 watts it makes more sense to use low level modulation and an amplifier than it did with the old rules. Now plate efficiency does not matter, you can still put the same amount of power into the antenna no matter what the efficiency of the transmitter is. In the past you wanted the highest plate efficiency that you could muster to get the most power into the antenna. I believe that the thinking of the past that "plate modulation is the only way to go" has more to do with not coming to grips with the fact that it is about how much power we can put into the antenna and not how much plate input we run as in the past. 73 Gary K4FMX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Info needed on "Taylor Modulation" from the 50's. | Boatanchors | |||
Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
Power Inductor Optimization... | Homebrew | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
NCI Position for Rulemaking | Policy |