![]() |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:
And you, sir, have been told, repeatedly, by ex military comms people (amongst others) thats its just a plain downright, stupid, time wasting, idiotic, non feasible "idea". Does it need to be spelt out any clearer than that? What dont you understand? Seriously, hams have long been responsible for taking time wasting idiotic non feasible "ideas" and VERY occasionally turning them into serious modes of communications. I agree that in this particular case the original idea has several enormous flaws. But with some of the modifications suggested here I think there may be something of some value in some emergency circumstances. Certainly the professionals who set up digitally trunked comm systems have a less than stellar track record at actual success ( do NOT confuse with "contractual success") and I have a large chip on my shoulder regarding ALL the billions of dollars that they've wasted at taxpayer expense. Not to mention the distortions they've caused to frequency allocations that actually WERE previously useful. And you would be SERIOUSLY surprised at some of the far stupider flawed ideas that are being funded by government agencies. Tim. |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
|
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
I never was behind. You, however, have no concept of what it is like to have boots in the dirt. Your prolly talking to one of those Pencil Pushing pentagon admin types we had to deal with :D. They have no concept what its like to be in the field. |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Mark Zenier wrote:
snip Contrary to popular opinion, I think that a packet radio relay made with a portable computer with a sound card, a CB transceiver, and a patch cable all made from stuff that you could "liberate" from the local Radio Shack is possible. Some sort of PTT control (VOX?) would be the hardest part. It is not a matter of being possible to do by someone who knows what they are doing. It is a matter of being practical to do by random, untrained people, and doing it many times. snip remaining -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
What the feds want to do is to be able to communicate mil-spec
digital packets over low power links in the middle of a disaster-hit area between squads of Guards deployed across a destroyed city. ==================================== Americans are always planning for war. It's an inbuilt disposition. That's the best way of guaranteeing they will get it sooner or later. Witness Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan, Palestine and many other places. But keep the Chinese, Russians and Indians in mind. No danger from them. But they are in a position to retaliate in kind. Why not plan for Peace! It's safer! |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
|
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Wars may be disasters, but disasters are not wars.
Reg Edwards wrote: What the feds want to do is to be able to communicate mil-spec digital packets over low power links in the middle of a disaster-hit area between squads of Guards deployed across a destroyed city. ==================================== Americans are always planning for war. It's an inbuilt disposition. That's the best way of guaranteeing they will get it sooner or later. Witness Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan, Palestine and many other places. But keep the Chinese, Russians and Indians in mind. No danger from them. But they are in a position to retaliate in kind. Why not plan for Peace! It's safer! |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Reg Edwards wrote:
What the feds want to do is to be able to communicate mil-spec digital packets over low power links in the middle of a disaster-hit area between squads of Guards deployed across a destroyed city. ==================================== Americans are always planning for war. It's an inbuilt disposition. That's the best way of guaranteeing they will get it sooner or later. Witness Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan, Palestine and many other places. But keep the Chinese, Russians and Indians in mind. No danger from them. But they are in a position to retaliate in kind. Why not plan for Peace! It's safer! Sure, do like you and spend your whole life with your head between your legs as you kiss your life good-bye. What a pathetic loser. If the rest of england had had your view you would have let Hitler have the keys to Buckingham Palace as his troops shot the men and raped the women. How wide is that yellow stripe? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Its just not good business. Peace works against Fear, Uncertainty and
Doubt, the prime movers of the business world. Why would you suggest such an irrational thing? Reg Edwards wrote: Why not plan for Peace! It's safer! -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY"© "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." "Follow The Money" ;-P |
is an STA needed to transmit data on CB channel 40?
Its just not good business. Peace works against Fear, Uncertainty and
Doubt, the prime movers of the business world. Why would you suggest such an irrational thing? Reg Edwards wrote: Why not plan for Peace! It's safer! -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "The RFI-EMI-GUY"© "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." "Follow The Money" ;-P |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com