Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MAc wrote: To clarify - the idea is to build very simple receiver - Not "play with quadrature detector". AD607 look simply and small Andy writes: While I agree with everything MAC wrote, I think a point is being missed. A Quadrature detector is normally used only for FM demodulation. It accomplishes this by limiting the signal and applying it to one port of a 90deg detector. If the limited signal is shifted 90 degrees (narrow band), the quad detector will detect FM... If the limited signal is shifted ZERO degrees, the quad detector will detect AM, and in a much more linear way than a diode type detector...... With CW, there would be no signal to zero beat with, and no audio note would be formed.... Exactly the same with SSB....all the output would be "DC"... Mac's explanation is correct for an IQ detector... In this case a local signal EQUAL to the suppressed carrier of the SSB signal has to be supplied..... I don't know how a local carrier can be synchronized to a SSB carrier that, if done really well, doesn't exist...... In Homodyne receivers, it is easy, since the transmit signal can be the LO signal..... Otherwise, it has to be "guessed" at..... With really really really stable local oscillators, the guess can be really close, and the difference will creat an error that is so small it doesn't matter... But, since you don't know the incident phase of the received signal, you have to do both I and Q and shift the IF by 90 degrees and sum (or difference, depending whether you want USB or LSB) the outputs of the two channels...... For SSB detection, the RF port is NOT shifted, the LO port is both 0 and 90 degrees, and the IF port ( I and Q) are shifted 90 and combined........ It is a hell of a lot easier to "approximate" the LO, and shift it manually until Donald Duck starts sounding human.... In older SSB rigs, this was called a "clarifier" control..... It isn't necessary in many modern systems with really really really good TCXOs and stuff.... Just my two cents worth.... If anyone disagrees, I'd be happy to learn from them where my explanation is wrong..... but I warn you, it ain't far wrong.... cause it worked for me for many many years in designing receivers for both commercial and military products ....:))))) Andy in Eureka, W4OAH ( retired comm/radar engineer and ham for 45 years ) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quadrature Hybrid Construction | Homebrew | |||
Quadrature mixing from 2xLO PLL? | Homebrew | |||
Quadrature mixing from 2xLO PLL? | Homebrew | |||
Phase differences in direct conversion receivers | Homebrew |