Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Donaly" wrote Reg, have you ever taken the time to learn _how_ to use one? Actually, they're just as mathematical as the formulas you've always used, and, for some people, just as useful. ======================================= Yes. Many years ago I attended a lecture. The lecturer handed round Smith Charts as a tutorial. We spent 10 minutes on it. But these days I'm well out of practice. The Smith Chart was only of any use at HF and above. That's what it was invented for. Fine for radio amateurs who only use the HF bands and above. It followed on from previous, more complicated Victorian Age charts to ease calculations involving complex Hyperbolic functions. Very good while it lasted. Small, dedicated computer programs these days are more accurate and time saving than charts and their 'what-if' operating procedures are much more educational. But I appreciate the sentimental attachment, indeed affection, many old timers have for the good old Smith Chart. By all means carry on using them. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Computer alternative to Smith Chart? | Antenna | |||
Billy Smith pegs the irony meter! | Shortwave | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |