Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that is the engineer in you speaking!
I find the Smith Chart interesting as a tool. I am more interested in how it works while you are interested in what it is good for! My desk drawers still contain a couple of slide rules, a polar planimeter, a drafting set and a Kurta Calculator. In spite of being surrounded by an assortment of computers, I keep a good battery in my HP Calculator and I remain fond of nomograms. The Smith Chart is a tool. I cannot possibly have too many tools... Of course I have archived the programs at g4fgq as well... We could quit teaching Calculus as well, Computers make quick work of graphic solutions! On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:28:24 +0100, "Reg Edwards" wrote: The Smith Chart was only of any use at HF and above. That's what it was invented for. Fine for radio amateurs who only use the HF bands and above. It followed on from previous, more complicated Victorian Age charts to ease calculations involving complex Hyperbolic functions. Very good while it lasted. Small, dedicated computer programs these days are more accurate and time saving than charts and their 'what-if' operating procedures are much more educational. But I appreciate the sentimental attachment, indeed affection, many old timers have for the good old Smith Chart. By all means carry on using them. ---- Reg. John Ferrell W8CCW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Computer alternative to Smith Chart? | Antenna | |||
Billy Smith pegs the irony meter! | Shortwave | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |