Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 1:05 am, Steve Bonine wrote:
On the other hand, you occasionally see these flashlights or radios that are powered by a crank that winds a spring and as the spring unwinds it generates enough power to create light or run the radio. So the technology has improved since the vintage model that we used for FD. Maybe it's now efficient enough (and small/light enough) to be usable. There's a big difference between powering a receiver and powering a transmitter. I have a Sony that receives for many hours on a single AAA battery. But 100 watts output from a transmitter cannot be reduced below 100 watts of supplied power. Given that efficiency may be around 50%, 200 watts of human generated energy is a heck of a lot of calories. Need to lose some weight? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Human-powered portable power generation | Moderated | |||
Human-powered portable power generation | Moderated | |||
Human-powered portable power generation | Moderated | |||
B&K battery powered portable dual trace Oscilloscope - $100 | Boatanchors | |||
Portable powered speaker | Shortwave |