Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... These are the number of current, unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains. --- 73 de Jim, N2EY The Changing Operating Classes Over the past year the Technician class has increased at an average rate of 13/day. The Tech Plus class has decreased at an average rate of 27/day. The Novice class has decreased at an average rate of 9/day. The General class has increased at an average rate of 7/day. The Advanced class has decreased at an average rate of 12/day. The Extra class has increased at an average rate of 6/day. Club Stations have increased at an average rate of 1/day. 73, Ace - www.WH2T.com .. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr.Ace" wrote:
The Changing Operating Classes Over the past year the Technician class has increased at an average rate of 13/day. As the de-facto entry-level license in ham radio, I would expect it to increase the most of all the license classes. The Tech Plus class has decreased at an average rate of 27/day. The Novice class has decreased at an average rate of 9/day. The Advanced class has decreased at an average rate of 12/day. Since the FCC is no longer issuing any of these licenses, it is mathematically impossible for them to "increase" at all. The very best they could do would be to maintain their exact numbers, assuming a 100% renewal rate and a 0% upgrade rate out of these classes into others. The General class has increased at an average rate of 7/day. The Extra class has increased at an average rate of 6/day. Or, a combined rate of 13/day, the same daily rate of increase in the Technician class license. An interesting statistical fluke? 73 kh6hz |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 8:57?am, "Dr.Ace" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... These are the number of current, unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains. --- 73 de Jim, N2EY The Changing Operating Classes Over the past year the Technician class has increased at an average rate of 13/day. The Tech Plus class has decreased at an average rate of 27/day. The Novice class has decreased at an average rate of 9/day. The General class has increased at an average rate of 7/day. The Advanced class has decreased at an average rate of 12/day. The Extra class has increased at an average rate of 6/day. Club Stations have increased at an average rate of 1/day. 73, Ace -www.WH2T.com The above is identical to the home page data shown at www.hamdata.com and reflects the changing class numbers one month (plus a few days) after the ending of US amateur radio license code testing. In the year prior to cessation of code testing, the no-code- test Technician class license growth had been in the vicinity of 28 to 30 per day average...with General and Amateur Extra class growth at half (or so) the values shown above. The only conclusion I can draw from that growth is the upgrading of Technicians to General or Extra, lessening the "growth" of Technicians due to their class change. Curiously, there has been a growth of Club licenses granted in the last year. I would have thought that Club licenses were relatively static since the overall licensee totals showed little growth or decline in numbers? 73, Len AF6AY |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In . com "AF6AY" writes: [...] Curiously, there has been a growth of Club licenses granted in the last year. I would have thought that Club licenses were relatively static since the overall licensee totals showed little growth or decline in numbers? 73, Len AF6AY I agree that this is a very non-intuitive result at first glance. One reasonable explanation would appear to be that there was a lot of pent-up demand for club licenses from over the relatively long period of time during which they were not issued, which was from at least 1978 to 1995. The official FCC answer on the subject of club and special (i.e., "Vanity") callsigns during that time was that it was too much of an administrative burden to grant them. The FCC was also using a relatively inflexible, legacy Honeywell system to track and issue amateur radio licenses. Those that held licenses during that time, licenses that were impact-printed on smudgy carbon "burst" forms, might note that they were only issued one day a week (Thursday, I believe). Existing club licenses could be renewed, but if they expired and passed out of their grace period without renewal, they could not be reissued. I understand that the grandfathered club licenses were tracked by the FCC manually in an index card catalog. I can attest personally to the fact that when members of the local amateur radio and USAF veterans' communities noticed that the FCC was going to allow club licenses and vanity callsigns again, they jumped at the chance to recover a couple of them that had expired many years ago. This included the base MARS/military-recreation station at Offutt Air Force Base, K0AIR, and the personal Nebraska callsign of General Curtis LeMay when he was the Commander-in-Chief of Strategic Air Command, K0GRL. The club that was formed to hold these callsigns, and use them for special events like Veteran's Day/General LeMay's birthday, has a home page at: http://www.sacmarc.org Other local clubs availed themselves of the opportunity to obtain special, distinctive callsigns for repeaters, contest stations, to honor deceased members who made significant contributions to the hobby/service, and the like. I think that the FCC has struck an appropriate balance between allowing a reasonable number of such club callsigns for legitimate use (such as to identify different stations or operational missions and resources) on one hand, versus discouraging callsign hoarding/banking on the other. I feel that it is appropriate to recover distinctive callsigns to honor deceased amateurs who made significant contributions to the hobby/service, and place them in special trust/usage. As long as it doesn't degrade to the point that huge swaths of desirable callsigns are taken out of use for other amateurs. I recall a "Tank McNamara" comic strip some years back with two team managers looking out over the starting lineup of a baseball game. One says to the other something like, "Maybe we should stop retiring numbers," as all of the players had increasingly lengthy, and tiny, numbers on the backs of their uniforms. - -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS) iD8DBQFGETG/6Pj0az779o4RAiVXAKCrlovWcjUiSM0BoQckrt2/5/CaqQCaA3JD kJYc9DXgHed2iFvsRPMfKR8= =4UVM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 10:21�am, Paul W. Schleck " wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In . com "AF6AY" writes: *[...] * Curiously, there has been a growth of Club licenses * granted in the last year. *I would have thought that Club * licenses were relatively static since the overall licensee * totals showed little growth or decline in numbers? * 73, Len *AF6AY I agree that this is a very non-intuitive result at first glance. *One reasonable explanation would appear to be that there was a lot of pent-up demand for club licenses from over the relatively long period of time during which they were not issued, which was from at least 1978 to 1995. *The official FCC answer on the subject of club and special (i.e., "Vanity") callsigns during that time was that it was too much of an administrative burden to grant them. *The FCC was also using a relatively inflexible, legacy Honeywell system to track and issue amateur radio licenses. *Those that held licenses during that time, licenses that were impact-printed on smudgy carbon "burst" forms, might note that they were only issued one day a week (Thursday, I believe). Existing club licenses could be renewed, but if they expired and passed out of their grace period without renewal, they could not be reissued. I understand that the grandfathered club licenses were tracked by the FCC manually in an index card catalog. The period between 1995 and 2007 is twelve years. In that interim there have been a number of abuses of the Vanity callsign system, most notably by Roy Tucker of southern California who once had the Tucker family holding 41 callsigns, all at the same street-city address. That is now down to a mere twenty or so. :-) History of the Vanity callsign system noted, the FCC now has a nice page on its website for applications of Vanity callsigns as well as renewals and other administrative changes. The FCC will immediately accept and process credit card fees for a Vanity call ($20.80) through another govenment agency link but they also explain that "it may take weeks to fully process [them]." 73, Len AF6AY |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 In .com "AF6AY" writes: On Apr 2, 10:21�am, Paul W. Schleck " wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In . com "AF6AY" writes: *[...] * Curiously, there has been a growth of Club licenses * granted in the last year. *I would have thought that Club * licenses were relatively static since the overall licensee * totals showed little growth or decline in numbers? * 73, Len *AF6AY I agree that this is a very non-intuitive result at first glance. *One reasonable explanation would appear to be that there was a lot of pent-up demand for club licenses from over the relatively long period of time during which they were not issued, which was from at least 1978 to 1995. *The official FCC answer on the subject of club and special (i.e., "Vanity") callsigns during that time was that it was too much of an administrative burden to grant them. *The FCC was also using a relatively inflexible, legacy Honeywell system to track and issue amateur radio licenses. *Those that held licenses during that time, licenses that were impact-printed on smudgy carbon "burst" forms, might note that they were only issued one day a week (Thursday, I believe). Existing club licenses could be renewed, but if they expired and passed out of their grace period without renewal, they could not be reissued. I understand that the grandfathered club licenses were tracked by the FCC manually in an index card catalog. The period between 1995 and 2007 is twelve years. That's true. So, it's probably not the only explanation, especially if annual growth of club licenses has been increasing recently. In my opinion, other plausible explanations based on more recent trends could include: - More amateurs being aware of the opportunity to establish club stations (I know there's been recent debate in many forums regarding how long it takes word of FCC action to trickle down into the general amateur radio population and become common knowledge. It's probably not twelve years, but it might not be 30 days, either.) - Fewer bureaucratic hurdles to obtaining amateur radio licenses in general, due to a debugged Universal Licensing System, VEC handling of club licensing applications, and clearer documentation by the FCC, the ARRL, and other entities regarding how to apply for and renew licenses - An aging amateur radio population that desires to establish more legacies for callsigns held either by clubs or notable individuals - A fear that another embargo of similar or greater length might happen in the foreseeable future - A desire to establish club stations for Elmering/recruiting purposes, or to give amateurs of modest means or those under antenna restrictions access to more capable stations at all bands including HF, especially in light of licensing requirement changes - Or even just clearer and more permissive feedback from the FCC concerning clubs obtaining 1 or more callsigns, both by statement, and by enforcement action, or lack thereof (see link below) In that interim there have been a number of abuses of the Vanity callsign system, most notably by Roy Tucker of southern California who once had the Tucker family holding 41 callsigns, all at the same street-city address. That is now down to a mere twenty or so. :-) In addition to flexing some welcome enforcement muscle against obvious abusers like the Tuckers, the FCC was also kind enough to make a clarification of policy about 8 years ago: http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/99/0709/#hollingsworth so club license applicants may no longer feel that they would be making themselves the "guinea pig" or "test case." - -- 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/ Finger for PGP Public Key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS) iD8DBQFGEpO76Pj0az779o4RAqIfAKCNQ7IAXjzwK1/MzpXD5khtPlYTOACfU+i3 9hGEBlhBUGdWxSJvSxGJMBA= =fSCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 11:57?am, "Dr.Ace" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... These are the number of current, unexpired FCC-issued amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains. The Changing Operating Classes Over the past year the Technician class has increased at an average rate of 13/day. The Tech Plus class has decreased at an average rate of 27/day. The Novice class has decreased at an average rate of 9/day. The General class has increased at an average rate of 7/day. The Advanced class has decreased at an average rate of 12/day. The Extra class has increased at an average rate of 6/day. Club Stations have increased at an average rate of 1/day. Ace, The numbers you posted above are derived from the hamdata.com website. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but those numbers include licenses that are expired but in the grace period. The numbers I post are current/unexpired licenses. Here's a comparison of the 361 days between April 2, 2006 and March 29, 2007, using the numbers of current, unexpired licenses held by individuals on those dates: (first number is April 2, 2006, second is March 29, 2007 Per-day changes are rounded to the nearest integer) Novice: 25614 \ 22473 decrease of 3141 (~9 per day) Technician: 278860 \ 288960 increase of 10100 (~28 per day) Technician Plus: 40534 \ 29402 decrease of 11132 (~31 per day) General: 133682 \ 136061 increase of 2379 (~7 per day) Advanced: 72819 \ 68507 decrease of 4312 (~12 per day) Extra: 107768 \ 109371 increase of 1603 (~4 per day) Total all classes: 659107 \ 654774 decrease of 4333 (~12 per day) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
April 22 2007 ARS License Numbers | Policy | |||
ARS License Numbers | Boatanchors | |||
ARS License Numbers | Scanner | |||
ARS License Numbers | Swap | |||
ARS License Numbers | General |