Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Bonine" wrote in message wrote: On Mar 14, 5:20 pm, Steve Bonine wrote: I don't object if others choose to participate in parades. I trust that they won't object if I choose not to do so. I certainly don't object. You've described other things that you chose to do. The thing that I object to is the folks who say that they don't have time to participate in training, but "I'll be there if you need me in an emergency." Sorry, but I'm one of those. I *don't* have time, I have a full time job and I volunteer for an animal rescue charity at the weekends, plus all the normal family/household things that most people do. Besides, what training is necessary to pass radio messages..? Don't we already know how to do that..? Or am I missing something..? 73 Ivor G6URP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ivor Jones wrote:
"Steve Bonine" wrote . . . The thing that I object to is the folks who say that they don't have time to participate in training, but "I'll be there if you need me in an emergency." Sorry, but I'm one of those. I *don't* have time, I have a full time job and I volunteer for an animal rescue charity at the weekends, plus all the normal family/household things that most people do. Besides, what training is necessary to pass radio messages..? Don't we already know how to do that..? Or am I missing something..? My experience in actual disasters suggests both good news and bad news in this regard. Bad news: Yes, you're probably missing something. Knowing how to pass radio messages is a valuable skill, but it doesn't translate directly to the kinds of tactical communications required during a real event. Having trained with your local group can be a big help, both in terms of honing specific skills, getting familiar with the local people so you work better as a team, and forging relationships with the local agencies that you're going to work with in the actual disaster. Good news: During the Katrina operation, I worked with a team of hams who had never met each other until we were thrown together in Mississippi. Experience and training ran the gamut from decades to minutes. We were able to meld into an effective operation and provide a much-needed service. Some in the group had a lot of training and experience that they shared with the rest of us. Most hams are fast learners and the basic experience of using the radio is valuable. So in the best of all worlds, everyone would have had training. In this world we live in, I understand that it's simply not possible for everyone, either because of time constraints or because there's no organized ham radio group in the area. My comment was actually aimed at a tiny minority of hams who show up on site and become a part of the problem rather than a part of the solution. These people do exist, even in the ham radio fraternity. 73, Steve KB9X |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ivor Jones wrote:
"Steve Bonine" wrote in message wrote: On Mar 14, 5:20 pm, Steve Bonine wrote: [snip] The thing that I object to is the folks who say that they don't have time to participate in training, but "I'll be there if you need me in an emergency." Sorry, but I'm one of those. I *don't* have time, I have a full time job and I volunteer for an animal rescue charity at the weekends, plus all the normal family/household things that most people do. Besides, what training is necessary to pass radio messages..? Don't we already know how to do that..? Or am I missing something..? Ivor, We're all too busy these days: I'd guess that the rest of the world said goodbye to the 40 hour work-week at about the same time as those of us in the U.S. Both parents working, kids in day care, constant juggling: it's a familiar story. But - Drills, especially large ones, are the _ONLY_ way to prepare for the mass confusion, conflicting agendas, egomania, short tempers, long waits, and broken radios that hams must deal with during a deployment. Those who don't prepare _are_ a part of the problem: however well-intentioned an operator might be, (s)he will bring a set of expectations and capabilities to a response which only training can shape. On my first deployment, I brought a massive backpack, which included almost nothing I later needed and almost everything I didn't. The drills that I attended after that did little to hone my radio skills, but a lot to make me ready to use them, quickly and effectively. In short, time is the currency of the realm in disaster response: it's the _only_ item that can't be bought, fabricated, fedex'd or helicoptered into a disaster. However well-intentioned a ham may be, if (s)he's not trained and in practice, then it takes time to get him/her up to speed, and that's time that's better used for other things. Those of us who must choose to spend our time in other activities - there is, of course, nothing wrong with that - can best prepare for disasters by getting ready to help from our own QTH: there are, after all, always two ends to any radio circuit. Bill P.S. There's are a lot of old sayings in the business: here are some I've found inspirational - "Always Arrange Agreement in Advance" "Bring Basics: Bandages, Bedding, Bottles, Batteries, Beans" "Proper Planning and Practice Provides Peak Performance" "Water, Wind, Waves, and Weakness Won't Wait". P.P.S. I'd bet there isn't a single question on any ham exam in the world that asks how much toilet paper to bring to a deployment; Q.E.D. -- 73, Bill W1AC (Remove "73" and change top level domain for direct replies) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Horne, W1AC" wrote in message ... Ivor Jones wrote: "Steve Bonine" wrote in message wrote: On Mar 14, 5:20 pm, Steve Bonine wrote: [snip] [snipped] P.P.S. I'd bet there isn't a single question on any ham exam in the world that asks how much toilet paper to bring to a deployment; Q.E.D. [snipped] Most hams won't even think to put it in there go kit. Another clue, if going on a long deployment (subjective) take twice as many socks as you think you will need and you will probably have enough. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ivor Jones wrote: Sorry, but I'm one of those. I *don't* have time, I have a full time job and I volunteer for an animal rescue charity at the weekends, plus all the normal family/household things that most people do. Besides, what training is necessary to pass radio messages..? Don't we already know how to do that..? Some do. Some do not. It does not come naturally. Chatting with someone on the radio, or making HF QSOs, is not necessarily going to prepare you for passing formal or semi-formal message traffic *efficiently* on a busy net, when you and everyone else are under stress in an emergency. Things like "listen before you transmit", "don't read the message faster than you can write it", "pause and drop carrier after every N words", "don't editorialize", "think of what you're going to say before you press PTT", and so forth don't come automatically, and it's disturbingly easy to forget them when under pressure. I believe that's just as true for "quarter century" hams as it is for the newly licensed. A message-net (formal or otherwise) with well-practiced operators can be a joy to observe. Just one or two untrained or out-of-practice ops can slow things to a crawl. My own experience, after five years as a ham and after dozens of training sessions and drills, is simply this: training and regular practice makes a huge difference. I remember reading a comment by Vladimir Horowitz, some years ago, about his piano practice. He said something to the effect of "If I skip my scales practice for a day, I can tell the difference in how well I play. If I skip it for two days, my wife can tell. If I skip it for three days, everybody can tell." -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:58:07 CST, "Ivor Jones"
wrote: Besides, what training is necessary to pass radio messages..? Don't we already know how to do that..? If "passing radio messages" was all that was required it wouldn't be a problem. I am a co-station-manager of an emergency radio unit at a major medical center EOC served by the county ARES/RACES unit. Over the five years there, we have had regular training exercises as well as several actual call-outs. Our position handles three (yes, three) voice circuits and two data (packet) circuits to two counties' EOCs and to the regional hospital dispatch center. It involves handling traffic in three different systems, using message forms particular to those systems -- remember that we support them and their operations, and do what they ask us to do for that support. Each operator (we usually have two per shift) has to know the functioning of each component of the EOC and how to navigate through them - they don't have time to teach us when "things happen". We may also be called on to operate the "regular" radio equipment that the med center uses on a day-to-day basis, and we have trained and licensed some of the emergency room support personnel to operate some ham radio equipment located in the ER which is on a specific inter-hospital system. In other words, we are an integral part of the EOC's operation. You cannot drop an untrained "I know how to pass radio messages" amateur operator into that mix and hope that it will function properly. What we do with such volunteers is to direct them to a resource net (the radio equivalent of the hospital's "labor pool" assignment system) for placement in positions that do not require that level of training. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon e-mail: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Public Service - NWS | Antenna | |||
Public Service | CB | |||
Public service | CB | |||
This is Public Service | Shortwave | |||
Seattle Public Service Frequencies in .P95 File for Use With Radio Shack Pro-95 | Scanner |