Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 10:03?am, Steve Bonine wrote:
Because amateur radio is supposed to be self regulating. Where is that written in the rules? I can't find it anywhere. Perhaps my impression is wrong, in which case I hope that someone will correct me, but don't most countries treat the regulation of amateur radio more like "here are your allocations"? Many countries outside the US do not have the specific subbands-by-mode that the USA does. What they do instead is to define the bands available to amateurs and the modes their amateurs are allowed on each of those bands. Where in a band that amateurs choose to use a particular mode in a particular band is left up to gentleman's agreements. Before applying this idea to US amateur radio, however, remember these points: 1) The US regulations in terms of subbands-by-mode are not much more complex than those of any other country. Above 30 MHz, most of the US amateur bands do not have subbands-by- mode at all. Same for 160 meters. The bands below 30 MHz (except 30 meters) are divided into two parts, with the lower part devoted to data modes and the upper part devoted to voice and image. CW (Morse Code) is allowed almost everywhere but is very rarely found in the voice/image subbands. 30 meters does not have a voice/image subband because it is only 50 kHz wide. 2) The number of amateurs in the USA who are authorized to operate non-QRP HF/MF transmitters is much greater than the number in any other country - or continent. 3) If the USA were to eliminate subbands-by-mode completely, the real-world effect would be to allow data modes all over the band instead of just the lower end, and voice modes all over the band instead of just the upper end. I would like to think that there are enough gentlemen in ham radio that gentlemen's agreements and voluntary bandplans would be sufficient. So would I. But the reality may be somewhat different. Based on what I hear on the air, that's a rather silly hope. I think it depends where you listen. Nonetheless, it reflects badly on our hobby that an agency needs to stand by with a big stick to make us do what we should be able to do on our own. Part of the problem is lack of enforcement by FCC of other rules of the ARS for a considerable number of years. This situation has improved in recent years, but it's not perfect by any means. It should also be remembered that the requirements for an amateur license, and the enforcement of rules, is usually quite different in other countries. (Compare the written-test requirements in the UK and US, for example). There are also considerable cultural differences. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PBS's Newshour 15 min segment on VOA-BBG (FRI 26 JAN)? Do mpeg copies exist (that are fully downloadable)? | Shortwave | |||
aluminium element segment corrosion & weather proofing... ? | Antenna | |||
Dipole Extension | Antenna | |||
dipole extension? | Antenna | |||
Daws Butler will be the subject of today's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED segment. | Broadcasting |