Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 22, 11:02�pm, wrote:
On Apr 22, 3:52 pm, wrote: Which would you rather lose - 1 MHz of the 1296 MHz band, or all of 160, 40, 20, 30 and 17 meter bands? Same amount of bandwidth... That's misdirection, Jim, and ignores the question "What are we going to do about that?" It's not misdirection, Hans. It's a plain and simple question, meant to focus on the fact that not all kHz are created equal. In 1912, amateurs were legislated to "200 Meters And Down", meaning they were legislated off what were then considered to be the most- useful wavelengths. So maybe the answer is that the FCC should craft a new challenge of similar magnitude to stimulate the Amateur Radio service to a new golden age, similar to that which followed the 200-meters-and-down challenge. Perhaps. How about this, for a two step approach? 1) Institute a new "top" license class with a "technical quotient" about 3 times as challenging as the current Extra class license, and keep the question pool secret. I like it! The only problem is, how would the question pool be kept secret? How could FCC be convinced, after a quarter-century of published Q&A pools and the VE system, that this new license class needed a different exam system than all the rest? *Holders of this license could experiment on any amateur frequency (with the usual "no deliberate interference" caveat) with any modulation scheme or information encoding scheme without special authorization or STA. The problem I see with that is, who defines 'experiment' or 'deliberate interference'? I could see the license being used as a way around mode-subband restrictions, rather than real experimentation. 2) Starting 10 years from the effective date of the R&O, require that the following band segments can only be used with modulation types and information coding schemes which were invented in the previous 15 years. *All of 160M. *3550-3600KHz. *3900-4000KHz. *7050-7150KHz. 7250-7300KHz. *14050-14100KHz. *14300-14350KHz. *21050-21100KHZ. 21400-21450KHz. *All of 10M. *146-148MHz. *222-225MHz. *All bands above 432MHz. Which means that 160, 10, 220 and all above 432 would no longer be available for the use of SSB, DSB, AM, FM, RTTY, AMTOR, PACTOR, SSTV, TV, PSK31, and CW. Plus considerable segments of the rest of the amateur bands would lose those modes as well. Not by voluntarily abandonment of old modes but by law. I don't think that's a good idea. Just because something isn't brand new doesn't mean it should be legislated off the air. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2nd generation DRM receiver due out in December | Shortwave | |||
2nd generation DRM receiver due out in December | Shortwave | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Antenna | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Homebrew | |||
PROJECT: next generation SWR/wattmeter | Homebrew |