| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Phil Kane wrote: On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:04:27 EDT, Bruce in alaska wrote: Hello Phil, I was wondering if the Secrecy Clause was still a part of the Communications Act of 1934, or if it had been rescinded or replaced by some other Language in some later Act? Does it still apply to any FCC Operator License Holder? snipped for brevity, but not for content..... For more information. "inquire within". This is one of my specialties. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane ARRL Volunteer Counsel email: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net Thanks, Phil... I was sure that you would have the information. Now the final question, that everyone wants to know, BUT was afraid to ask..... Have you ever heard of ANYONE, ever being prosecuted for Violation of Section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934....... -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Santa Clause like you have never seen him before | Antenna | |||
| Santa Clause like you have never seen him before | Shortwave | |||
| Digital watermarks prove Easter Bunny son of Santa Clause | Shortwave | |||
| Swiss Dig in Heels Over Banking Secrecy | Shortwave | |||
| FA: 1934 ARRL Handbook | Swap | |||