Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 19th 08, 07:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 69
Default Secrecy Clause of the Communications Act of 1934

In article ,
Phil Kane wrote:

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:04:27 EDT, Bruce in alaska
wrote:

Hello Phil, I was wondering if the Secrecy Clause was still a part of
the Communications Act of 1934, or if it had been rescinded or replaced
by some other Language in some later Act? Does it still apply to any FCC
Operator License Holder?



snipped for brevity, but not for content.....

For more information. "inquire within". This is one of my
specialties.
--

73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
ARRL Volunteer Counsel

email: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net


Thanks, Phil... I was sure that you would have the information.
Now the final question, that everyone wants to know, BUT was afraid to
ask.....

Have you ever heard of ANYONE, ever being prosecuted for Violation
of Section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934.......

--
Bruce in alaska
add path after fast to reply

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 20th 08, 05:12 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 300
Default Secrecy Clause of the Communications Act of 1934

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:22:41 EDT, Bruce in alaska
wrote:

Have you ever heard of ANYONE, ever being prosecuted for Violation
of Section 705 of the Communications Act of 1934.......


There are a lot of cases brought under Section 705, most having to do
with theft of satellite TV programming or bootleg cable TV
descramblers which are covered by other subsections of Section 705.
One curious case involved a subscription-TV provider who enabled
Canadian providers to intercept its signals as opposed to a Canadian
program supplier competitor, the case being brought on complaint of
the Canadian government because the violator and the site of the
violation was in the US.

Most of the cellphone or cordless phone interception cases are brought
under the Wiretap Act (the ECPA) of the U S Criminal Code, Title 18.

The most famous case of off-the-air interception and divulgence
involved a conversation between certain officials of the Republican
party which was passed to "others", but long before that there were a
few cases of taxicab radio interception by competing cab companies
whose drivers "jumped" calls.
--

73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest

Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon

e-mail: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Santa Clause like you have never seen him before Gary S. Antenna 0 February 8th 05 03:49 PM
Santa Clause like you have never seen him before m II Shortwave 1 December 29th 04 06:42 PM
Digital watermarks prove Easter Bunny son of Santa Clause Rustle Shortwave 3 May 29th 04 02:07 PM
Swiss Dig in Heels Over Banking Secrecy DeWayne Shortwave 0 April 5th 04 08:54 AM
FA: 1934 ARRL Handbook Rob S. Swap 0 March 5th 04 09:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017