Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 6:13 pm, AF6AY wrote:
Paul Schleck posted on 24 Mar 08: AF6AY writes: According to this recent demonstration on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhsSgcsTMd4 Ahem...quibble mode on...that little bit on the Tonight Show was a 'setup' gig that employed two young local male actors as the (described) "text messaging experts" No, it wasn't. They were not actors. In the clip, the sending text messager is described by Jay Leno as "the country's fastest text messager" and his name is given as "Ben Cook". He says his record is sending a 160 character message in 57 seconds. Those facts can be verified by watching the clip. 160 characters in 57 seconds at 5 characters per word works out to approximately 33.68 wpm. 160 characters in 57 seconds at 6 characters per word (allowing for spaces between words) works out to approximately 28.07 wpm. The current Guinness Book of World Records for a 160 character message is 41 seconds. That works out to about 46.83 and 39.02 wpm for 5 and 6 characters-per-word, respectively. All are well below the world-record Morse Code speed, or the speed of skilled Morse Code operators. The 160 character message used in the text-message speed-record attempts is a standard message previously disclosed, so that all attempts use the same message. The Leno test used a message unknown to any of the participants. but the two hams (one of which would very soon become marketing director for Heil Sound) were real. That is the input I got directly from a reliable staffer on the Tonight Show. Whom you do not name, so his information cannot be verified independently. Took a few phone calls to get that information but it is an advantage of living inside the entertainment capital of the USA (aka Los Angeles, CA)...and the NBC western Hq is only about 5 miles south of my place, down Hollywood Way to Alameda and then east about a mile. What difference does that make? That whole bit was really a send-up on the popular fad of text messaging done by teeners and young adults. That bit is about as 'real documentary' as Leno's send-ups on the 'street interviews' with ordinary (apparently clueless) younger folk on various kinds of knowledge. In short, ONLY for gag purposes. Sorry, but I've got to call baloney on this one. The individual who appeared on the Tonight Show who sent the text message was actually Ben Cook, and not an actor. Ben held the world's record for fastest text messaging: If you say so, then it is so. No, it has been verified by several independent sources, including people who were actually there and part of the test. That 'recent demonstration' was over a year ago, was it not? Yes - what difference does that make? The video clip can be reviewed for confirmation. "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno" is an entertainment vehicle. It is not a documentary source of absolute facts. Yet the facts are clear: Neither the text message sender nor the Morse Code operators were actors, according to named people who were actually there. The two Morse code operators, Chip Margelli, K7JA, and Ken Miller, K6CTW, have attested to this being an actual contest with an actual, previously unknown, message to send, which was sent both by Morse code, and by text messaging. And there's no disputing that fast Morse code would always beat an SMS text message of the same length. I have corresponded with Mr. Margelli in his new position as Director of Marketing for Heil Sound...about Heil products, not about this alleged 'test' or 'contest' on the 'Leno show.' Yet you use the word "alleged" and imply he is wrong when he says the text-messager was not an actor. I have NO complaints about Mr. Margelli's nor Mr. Miller's capabilities with manual morse code communications. OK so far. I only have complaints about this entertainment gig being used as 'factual demonstration' of any comparison of manual morse code versus any other mode. Why? What are the complaints? What was not factual about the demonstration? Do you think that text messaging is faster than Morse Code done by skilled operators? The text-messaging sender has been identified as a record-holder named Ben Cook. The record text-messge speed is below that of skilled Morse Code operators, and the text-messager simply lost the speed race. Not just on the show, but in rehearsals. The two Morse Code operators, K7JA and K6CTW, have publicly and privately said it was a real test. Are they not telling the truth? Why should anyone believe your account of an unnamed ex-staffperson, and not believe two identified people who were actual participants? Two named witnesses would appear to trump one anonymous source. Therefore, your anonymous "reliable staffer" seems anything but. I cannot argue your statements or 'baloney' comments in this venue. Why not? What's wrong with "this venue"? My original source is now working for another show. No more access to Tonight show records is possible. If you or any other morse code mode champion say it was a 'real test,' then it must be a real test. What was wrong with the test? Given the evidence, why would any reasonable person say it was not a real test? As to the efficacy claim that manual morse code communications beats cellular telephone textual-only (by keypad) communications, I do not know of a single communications service or provider that uses 'text' (via cellphone) for two-way communications. Mine does. When I receive a text message, the cellphone display shows "reply" in the lower left corner. All I have to do is push the right button, type in my message, and push "send". The recipient can text me back, too. That's two-way communications. I've had long conversations via text messaging that way. It's slow but it works. Effective in noisy environments or when having a voice call is otherwise not the best choice. Text messaging is a useful communications tool. So is Morse Code. I use both. Of what point was this entertainment venue 'test' actually proving? It showed that old methods aren't necessarily slower or less useful than newer ones. In the first part of the clip, Jay Leno selects a young lady from the audience, talks to her a bit, and asks if she thinks Morse Code or text messaging is faster. The young lady says text messaging is faster. The audience agrees. Jay Leno then brings out the "country's fastest text messager" (not an actor) and the two Morse Code operators, introduces them, and explains the test. The audience and the young lady are confident that the new technology of text messaging will be faster than the old Morse Code. Yet when the test is actually run, Morse Code proves to be faster, and produces a hard-copy printout for verification. The world-record-holder could not beat a couple of amateurs going at a fraction of the Morse Code record speed. Not only is the bit entertaining, it proves the point of newer not always being faster. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hydrometer calculation | Homebrew | |||
LC calculation | Homebrew | |||
How to get -89.5 dBM in this IP3 calculation | Homebrew | |||
ring capacity calculation? | Antenna | |||
IP3 calculation and estimation | Antenna |