Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
In Feb 2009, all TVs will become digital. As a result, analog TV spectrum will become available. It will be auctioned off. Chances are it will go to big companies, making their monopoly even bigger. I went looking for discussion on what is likely to happen. Ivor points out that it will be 2012 before the change is made in the UK, yet the first article I found is from the UK. Apparently they're actually thinking about this, studying it, and examining what the best use would be for the resources. (See http://preview.tinyurl.com/3p3uvo ) US organizations are, too. At http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/10349.cfm I found this quote: Advocacy groups such as Public Knowledge and Consumers Union say the auction represents the best and last opportunity for large portions of the U.S. to have a third broadband provider that competes with the cable and telecom giants. These groups are asking the FCC to require that part of the auctioned spectrum be sold with so-called open-access rules attached, meaning the winner of the auction would have to sell wholesale access to the network to any company that wants it. These frequencies would be better used if it went to amateur radio, public non-license radio ( like FRS and CB is now), and small business (such as letting small business offer commercial radio services). Apparently 24 MHz of the available 84 MHz has already been earmarked for public safety. Is the current allocation of two-way public non-license or amateur-radio-license spectrum sufficiently saturated to justify additional allocation? Personally I don't think so, but maybe in urban areas things are different. Alot of innovative applications will result. And it will create jobs and new businesses that would otherwise not exist. Also, it would increase public interest and involvement. What innovative applications would you anticipate? I don't see either commercial or amateur radio services expanding just because they have additional spectrum. Where's the demand? Who is going to buy radio service when they already have a cell phone in their hand? If we do nothing, these frequencies will be lost. Lets lobby now. It's probably too late to do any effective lobbying on this issue. But the frequency spectrum won't be "lost"; it will be used somehow. The question is whether it will be used in the "best way". Problem is, different people have different ideas of what the "best way" might be. I don't envy the FCC the policy task of walking the tightrope between letting market forces decide and placing curbs in place to prevent "big money" from becoming "bigger money". 73, Steve KB9X |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lets DX | Shortwave | |||
Lets DX | Shortwave | |||
The Israeli Lobby FINALLY EXPOSED. | Policy | |||
Cool Yahoo! radio group "ownership" up for grabs! | CB | |||
Big Honker Up for Grabs | Policy |