Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:
Dick Grady AC7EL wrote: However, the object of Field Day is to contact as many stations as possible. I thought the purpose of Field Day was to serve as a training ground for emergency preparedness. And a time to experiment with new techniques and technology in an "emergency" setting without it being a "real" emergency. I think you are both correct. While the purpose is emergency preparedness, the format seems rather contest like. Keeping score, different classes, posting the scores in QST. It's just a way to inject some fun in the whole process. Get folks on the air, and nothing like a little competition to get a person to improve their skills. Considering the relative ease of setting up an NVIS antenna system, and the number of other stations on the air, Field Day makes a perfect time to see how it performs and to map it's effectiveness for short range HF communications. Let's look at Field day. We're pretty much not DX'ing to begin with. Excepting Alaska and Hawaii, the distances aren't that vast. So a Low takeoff angle antenna isn't even the best choice, IMO. My experiments show the low angle antenna to have a very strong local signal, then for a few hundred miles out it is not very good, then it starts improving, and for very long distances it tends to be better than the NVIS type. That was done on 75 meters, and keep in mind that it was not over a long period of time - around 2 weeks, but I'm fairly confident that I'm at least in the ball park. I worked Field Day once overnight on 75 meters using 100 watts, and an off center fed dipole at 40 feet. I used that setup to work the west coast, and Hawaii and Alaska. I ran and held frequencies the whole night long. I would recommend if a group was going to put up a "DX angle" antenna, they would be well served to put up an NVIS antenna to complement it. Maybe I'm going blind in my old age, but I just don't see contesting under 47CFR97.1 Ever since cavemen started rolling boulders around in the woods, they figured out how to turn it into a competition. It seems to be what we humans do best. ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Coslo" wrote in message ... I think you are both correct. While the purpose is emergency preparedness, the format seems rather contest like. Keeping score, different classes, posting the scores in QST. - 73 de Mike N3LI - Must not be a contest then, because contest scores don't get posted in QST under current management. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Antenna | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Policy | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Policy | |||
There was one good thing about restructuring | Policy | |||
Anyone using antennas for NVIS? | Antenna |