| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
Dear Mr. Robeson,
Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post he said he was going to write and try to comfrim my service in HMC 47th CSB (provisional) then part of 214th FA 3 copr art Ft Sill ok I knew he would not confrim the current location of the 47 csb at sill indeed the unit I believe has been reorgaized out of existance although the paerent unit of the formation the 47 th Feild Hospital likely remerges from this I have heard they may be a irag but I frankly don't know or realy much care I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) but I welcome it as it serves as proof that Robeson has lied us and therfore the claims I and other have made about his veracity ( or rather the lack there of) inthat post the Major Of Cap has choosen to fake a comincation from the US Army it itself. inded after this how can anything he has claimed about any DoD matter be trusted It would seem that Robeson admits defeat for the monet by quiting the feild here in USENET but he will most like be back after he thinks his misdeeds are forgotten |
Markie backpedals now that his Army service lie is exposed like his EME "contacts"
an old fraud wrote: Dear Mr. Robeson, Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post he said he was going to write and try to comfrim my service in HMC 47th CSB (provisional) then part of 214th FA 3 copr art Ft Sill ok I knew he would not confrim the current location of the 47 csb at sill indeed the unit I believe has been reorgaized out of existance although the paerent unit of the formation the 47 th Feild Hospital likely remerges from this I have heard they may be a irag but I frankly don't know or realy much care I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) but I welcome it as it serves as proof that Robeson has lied us and therfore the claims I and other have made about his veracity ( or rather the lack there of) inthat post the Major Of Cap has choosen to fake a comincation from the US Army it itself. inded after this how can anything he has claimed about any DoD matter be trusted It would seem that Robeson admits defeat for the monet by quiting the feild here in USENET but he will most like be back after he thinks his misdeeds are forgotten Poor Markie, his lies about his Army "service" are exposed like his fake EME contacts. How did that three way sex session go with your shemale wife and your old dying daddy go last night? |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] Dear Mr. Robeson, Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post he said he was going to write and try to comfrim my service in HMC 47th CSB (provisional) then part of 214th FA 3 copr art Ft Sill ok I knew he would not confrim the current location of the 47 csb at sill indeed the unit I believe has been reorgaized out of existance although the paerent unit of the formation the 47 th Feild Hospital likely remerges from this I have heard they may be a irag but I frankly don't know or realy much care I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. but I welcome it as it serves as proof that Robeson has lied us and therfore the claims I and other have made about his veracity ( or rather the lack there of) Major Dud BLUFFS his way through his claims on here. He makes claims of his own and tries to pass off those claims as "truth" (perhaps because he WANTS his imaginings to be true). Witness: 1. Years of claiming to be an active-duty USMC member yet NO evidence presented in ANY FORM of claimed 18 years service. Not one single digitized copy of any official papers, not one photograph of himself or anything else taken while in that 18-year service. 2. He has repeatedly challenged "call the VA" to "verify" his service. However, the Veteran's Administration is NOT the place to verify that nor will they give out full information on a past or current service member to just anyone making an inquiry. The archives of all service members are kept in the St. Louis National Archives Center and do send out copies of individuals' records but ONLY to IDENTIFIED individuals (or their identifiable kin). Copies require a small fee. 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. 4. We have NO way of verifying that Major Dud is actually a "Major" in the Tennessee Civilian Air Patrol. He has a photograph of himself in a (somewhat used) flight suit with embroidered rank identification (of Captain) on it. He has not posted any CAP URL that has personnel listings on it nor has he presented any digitized copy of any CAP official records concerning him. 5. He once had a photograph of himself as a "First Lieutenant" in the Tennessee STATE National Guard (not affiliated with the federal national guard organization) as "communications officer" of one "brigade" (less than battalion in size according to the Tennessee State Guard's own website information. That "career" was short-lived and there are no records available of either his joining or his leaving. 6. His AOL home page has a link to a National Hang-Gliding Association and he once claimed to do that. However, he has never mentioned his glider, its make and model, nor where he glides, nor anyone he claims to know. We get a lot of INFERENCE but never any direct reference nor evidence. I am acquainted with a few hang-gliding enthusiasts here and they fly at only one location, have lots of pictures of themselves and others gliding. inthat post the Major Of Cap has choosen to fake a comincation from the US Army it itself. inded after this how can anything he has claimed about any DoD matter be trusted Mark, we can't trust Major Dud in much of anything on news- groups. If you recall, Brian Burke and myself took him to task on the Department of Defense DIRECTIVE on the mission and organization of the Military Affiliate Radio System. Major Dud was unaware of that directive, refused to acknowledge it (yet was downloadable from the DoD by anyone), and kept claiming for the longest time that "amateurs directed MARS." They don't. DoD directs MARS. Always has. After YEARS of claims of active-duty USMC service in here we haven't been presented with one shred of evidence from either official or unoffical sources that he ever did what he said was nor held the rank he claimed. It would seem that Robeson admits defeat for the monet by quiting the feild here in USENET but he will most like be back after he thinks his misdeeds are forgotten "Nevah hoppen, GI." :-) [old Japlish exclamation of the 50s] Major Dud will NEVER admit defeat nor will he EVER acknowledge a correction other than a typographical error. He is a BLUFFER and bluffers will simply try to misdirect any callings-out on errors or mistakes...or he will go into an emotional tirade of personal insults directed at his accusers. If that doesn't work, he MANUFACTURES "reasons" why his accusers do what they do (or don't do). False "reasons" supported only by his imagination. Major Dud lives in a world where IMAGE IS EVERYTHING...rank, position, "official accreditation," activities of a macho nature, but, especially, his wishful thinking. He is King in that world and no one DARE dethrone him! Major Dud WANTS ATTENTION. So much of the message content in here involves him and his disputes with others that, before the onslaught of the middle-school-mind filth-sayers, this news- group was rife with it. Hardly anything about amateur radio policy, just Major Dud and his "enemies" endlessly sparring, egged-on (also endlessly) by Major Dud hisself. Yes, it would be good if he simply went away. He won't in my estimation. The Internet and Newsgroups are an excellent vehicle for his bluffing, inferences of "greatness", etc. He is SAFE there, isolated by time and distance, and thinks he can maneuver perceptions of himself by others by his claims and inferences. Unfortunately, he gets very upset emotionally by challenges and corrections and erupts in vitriolic behavior when confronted. Politeness disappears and he becomes abusive. [he accepts that for, after all, "kings" are allowed to act that way in his world] --------- Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. :-) |
More Morkie Mularkie...Now Dipped In LennieLies for Flavor!
wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] Major who? Dear Mr. Robeson, Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post he said he was going to write and try to comfrim my service in HMC 47th CSB (provisional) then part of 214th FA 3 copr art Ft Sill ok I knew he would not confrim the current location of the 47 csb at sill indeed the unit I believe has been reorgaized out of existance although the paerent unit of the formation the 47 th Feild Hospital likely remerges from this I have heard they may be a irag but I frankly don't know or realy much care I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: Major who? 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. There doesn't need to be, Lennie.. Morkie himlself confirmed that his "HMC 47th CSB" unit was bogus. Remainder of Lennie Rant Snipped due to lack of relevent and factual context. In other words...More LennieLies Steve, K4YZ |
More Morkie Mularkie...Now Dipped In LennieLies for Flavor! deal with your lies Robeson
K4YZ wrote: wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. There doesn't need to be, Lennie.. Morkie himlself confirmed that his "HMC 47th CSB" unit was bogus. I said no such thing I said correctly that the 47th is no longer at Ft Sill you claimed the the 214th does not exist either " Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. " while 2 minutes with google.com finds http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm Remainder of Lennie Rant Snipped due to lack of relevent and factual context. you are the one with no factual content In other words...More LennieLies nope more efforts by Robeson to lie to lenn you were right I was worng stve is dumb enough to brazen this out his lies some more Steve, K4YZ |
More Morkie Mularkie
an old friend wrote: wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] Dear Mr. Robeson, Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post he said he was going to write and try to comfrim my service in HMC 47th CSB (provisional) then part of 214th FA 3 copr art Ft Sill ok I knew he would not confrim the current location of the 47 csb at sill indeed the unit I believe has been reorgaized out of existance although the paerent unit of the formation the 47 th Feild Hospital likely remerges from this I have heard they may be a irag but I frankly don't know or realy much care I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: indeed I know it is Oh...So now you've retracted your admission that your "HMC 47th CSB" is non-existant? HUGE SNIP OF LENNIE RANT 4. We have NO way of verifying that Major Dud is actually a "Major" in the Tennessee Civilian Air Patrol...(SNIP) Geeze, Lennie...after getting your nose rubbed in your anti-civilian defense rants of over a year ago, can you not even get the names of the organizations right? And yes, there's SEVERAL ways to verify that someone is a member of Civil Air Patrol. And BTW...Who is "Major Dud"...?!?! He has a photograph of himself in a (somewhat used) flight suit with embroidered rank identification (of Captain) on it. He has not posted any CAP URL that has personnel listings on it nor has he presented any digitized copy of any CAP official records concerning him. The flight suit is "somewhat used" from actually being worn by me in the types of emergency services you only give lip service to. Will you take My word for it? Steven J Robeson was at least a major in CAP on or about 13 jan 2006 I base this on My own conversation with the Office of CAP Military Liason There's no such office, Morkie. Nice try. Dudly has complained loudly to this forum about my effort to seek jusitce though channels There's nothing to complain about, Morkie. You have no "recourse" for any of the exchanges in this forum via Civil Air Patrol. As is clearly evident by CAP's snubbing of your "complaint". 5. He once had a photograph of himself as a "First Lieutenant" in the Tennessee STATE National Guard (not affiliated with the federal national guard organization) as "communications officer" of one "brigade" (less than battalion in size according to the Tennessee State Guard's own website information. That "career" was short-lived and there are no records available of either his joining or his leaving. Uh...No, Lennie...I never has a picture of me in a Tennessee State Guard uniform on any webpage. And there's no such organization as the "Tennessee State National Guard." Again, you try to "diss" people for thier volunteer efforts, yet can't even get the name of those organizations right! inthat post the Major Of Cap has choosen to fake a comincation from the US Army it itself. inded after this how can anything he has claimed about any DoD matter be trusted Mark, we can't trust Major Dud in much of anything on news- groups. If you recall, Brian Burke and myself took him to task on the Department of Defense DIRECTIVE on the mission and organization of the Military Affiliate Radio System....(SNIP) Uh huh. And both of you ahd your noses rubbed in YOUR multiple errors, Lennie. Then and now, Leonard H. Anderson remains a liar. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Major Dud was unaware of that directive, refused to acknowledge it (yet was downloadable from the DoD by anyone), and kept claiming for the longest time that "amateurs directed MARS." They don't. DoD directs MARS. Always has. Continues to lie.... indeed dudly is leaving quite a trail of bread crumbs these days And More Morkie Mularkie. After YEARS of claims of active-duty USMC service in here we haven't been presented with one shred of evidence from either official or unoffical sources that he ever did what he said was nor held the rank he claimed. Still MORE lies coming from the keyboard of someone who professes to be an educated electrical engineer (THAT never proven). What a waste of 14 years of education, eh, Lennie...?!?! HUGE SNIP OF RE-TREAD LENNIE LIES....SEEN ALREADY OVER AND OVER AND OVER.... Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. His actions will be as I've described. you may be right f it truns out that way I amitt to error Mork, your entire lfe has been an error and strong argument for post-puberty abortions. my own is he will without comment several weeks an then reutrn a in blaze of libel when he think we have forgotten (or maybe when he just can't stand it anymore) What libel, Morkie? Steve, K4YZ |
more lies from the Major
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] Dear Mr. Robeson, Thank-you for your e-mail of 01 August 2006 In reference to your inquiry, no such unit "HMC 47 CSB (PROVISIONAL)" has ever been located at Ft Sill. Furthermore I find no reference to any "214 FA BRIGADE" at Ft Sill or any other US Army facility. I hope this answers your questions. WILLIAM C ANDERS JR ______________________________________ the above is quote from steve recent post I did not expect steve to dare say the 214th does not exist (it does http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: indeed I know it is Oh...So now you've retracted your admission that your "HMC 47th CSB" is non-existant? I made no such admission what about you lie that the 214th FA does not exist http://sill-www.army.mil/3ca/214web/214th.htm ) my own is he will without comment several weeks an then reutrn a in blaze of libel when he think we have forgotten (or maybe when he just can't stand it anymore) What libel, Morkie? do you realy have such a short memeory Steve, K4YZ |
get some therapy
|
, get some therapy
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA |
The Feeble Five Reunion On RRAP
LenCan'tPassAn wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old fiend to small children on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] But I still see your post, Lennie. Guess you're not as decent as you claim. (As if THAT was news...) Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... Hard to write when you have nothing meaningful to say. We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). Nope. You've been given more than adequate references to follow-up on. You've certainly spammed us with enough stories about ADA. And not a single "new" thing since 1963 or 4... BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Who's "Major Dud"...? And nice try on the diversion, Lennie. Weak, but hey, you're old and...well...feeble. HUGE SNIP OF USUSAL ANTI-STEVE BUFFONERY MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. Well, we see that Lennie's now ANTI-MARS. I see you haven't been keeping up with current events vis-a-vis MARS and it's expaning roles, Lennie. But why should you? On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station OH YES! More "...there I was back in 1953 at ADA, watching the finals glow in the dark...." http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. More like shoulder shrugging "...don't care..." about what you did in 1953, Lennie. MORE SNIP Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. And it's obvious that your rant hasn't changed and you've not been able to find your way to a VE session. Poor Lennie. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
Markie, get some therapy
an old fraud wrote: wrote: an old fraud wrote: no steve got caught the NG is now full of proof The NG is full of your spams and lies, too. no spam or lies Yep, Google has those spams and lies of yours archived. you ca n follow the links yourself More lies. You were caught lying about your "unit". no spam ever from me or at least nothing Hughes net considers spam Sure they do. It's spelled out in their policies. both units that he claim never existsed did Nope, you claimed to be a part of it when you weren't. I was abut still stve claimed the units do not exist they do Nope. so steve lied No, he caught you in a lie, though. get some therapy both of you You need it for your chronic lying. that is tranference you lie all the time so assume everybody else does Plagiarizing, Markie???? The term "transference" was in a previous post about you. get some therapy Get some for your lying, fraud. |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. Robescum requires his own "AIG" and comm center. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) I'd be wrong if I said that everything that Robescum posts is fraudulent. So I won't. Let the reader beware that they need to inspect every Robescum posting for fraud. 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. I think he just liked listening in on phone patches from real servicemen to their wives. He probably got in a few minutes of "comfort time " with the wives after the patch went "dead." On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf Fascinating stuff. If only Robescum had served... he might have such a scrapbook. I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). You probably did more to update their archives... Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. Wondr how that sounds in Morse Code? An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm I never served in Europe even though I was on the volunteer list forever. Three tours in PACAF. 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. There is a group that goes after fakers. I think they're called "Stolen Valor." They're probably aware of Robescum. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. He said that we were welcome to his VA records. Maybe he'll shoot us his SSN via the "backchannel," though I doubt he remembers it himself. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. If Robescum told me that the sun would rise tomorrow morning at 6:23 AM, I'd have to get up and verify it myself. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Hmmm? A 1LT with Captain's bars? Typical Robescum. Wasn't he claiming to be enlisted in the USMC? I'll bet he got a boner putting on that used flight suit. Oh, was that his stomach sticking out? Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. Some people are proud of their service, others have something to hide. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. Mitty. Walter Mitty. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? His YL hasn't backed him in years. 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Forever the "career" climber. Hi! If any of it were truth! Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Robescum is pathetic. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) Robeson is the one, the only, the original truth-teller. To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. Mitty. Walter Mitty. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA By his absence, I thought that Robescum might have been incarcerated or doiing some heavy duty counseling. Summer is about over. Been working too much. I took the kids to the barber and to the movies - Ant Bully. Need to do something fun before school starts so the kids remember that I'm still their dad. didit |
Mork Moron Pontificating About "Honnor"
wrote in multiple, unrelated NG's (snipped): On 10 Aug 2006 20:00:31 -0700, wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. The "ePI"...?!?! A new electronics formula, Lennie? at least were still touch with honnor (HUGE SNIP) Mork, YOU have GROSSLY DIShonored both yourself and members of the United States Armed Forces with your pathetic lies...first about being a field grade officer, then about being an Enlisted man. Don't you DARE presume to talk about Honor in uniform, little boy! You're just not up to the task! And Lennie has dishonored himself with HIS pathetic attempts to "glorify" his newsgroup postings with his lame references to having served in a communications batallion that had KIA's in Korea in such a way as to make it appear as though he was somehow part-and-parcel of the sacrifices those brave men made. And then we have Lennie's "Incomming Artillery" story...what a hoot!~ The only difference between you and Lennie is that Lennie has provided SOME proof that HIS service was legitimate...It's just too bad he tarnished it with that disgusting end-run for the sake of pathetic newsgroup messaging points... Putz. Or more appropriately...putzii Steve, K4YZ |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling on her |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
an old fraud wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor No, you lied about your military service. with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling on her You don't have any spelling skills to "improve," you illiterate *******. |
Mountains and Mountains of Morkie's Military Mularkie
NotLloyd wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. What's the "ePI"...?!?! indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor No, you lied about your military service. Yep...over and over and over and over and........... Steve, K4YZ |
cease and desist
K4YZ wrote: cease and desist |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] His "word???" They don't call him Robesin for nothing. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. It is important for Robesin to make fun of the dead. Shows that he has no bounds, will do whatever it takes. But no one else can make fun of the dead, especially his kin. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. Somebody has got Robesin's terminal software. He's gonna have a long sitdown with that sumbich when they finally get together. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) Fraus is Robesin's middly name. 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station Major Screwup is what they called Robesin, and he didn't have a whole comm center to help make it happen. Did it all by hisself. http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. Everyone who's anybody has heard of Major Robesin and his legendary screwups!. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). All those MWR/USNMC MARS phone patches home to lonely stateside wives is what got Major Robesin innerested in phone patchin to begin with. Forget that official message traffic stuff. Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm He asked for a mission. For his sins, they gave Major Robesin one. Eavesdropping on USNMC MARS phone patches to stateside wives. 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. They should start one for his sake. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. He's hiding something. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Can't be true. He was VERY specific about the "A" in front of NCOIC. So he's lying again. Always got a be just a little better than he actually was. Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Somebody come to Robesin's rescue. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. Everyone lies except for Robesin. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA Bacteria. |
Mountains and Mountains Of Markie Mularkie
|
Mountains and Mountains of Robeson shit
K4YZ wrote: wrote: " Mountains and Mountains ofrobeson ####" just being accurate now cease and desist your harrassment |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 05:56:53 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor No, you lied about your military service. with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling on her You don't have any spelling skills to "improve," you illiterate *******. cease and desist STFU, whining illiterate *******. |
Mountains and Mountains of Markie Mularkie
an old friend tried to hide behind yet more profanity: K4YZ wrote: wrote: " Mountains and Mountains ofrobeson ####" just being accurate now You couldn't be accurate iof you had your last name changed to it. cease and desist your harrassment Your re-taggin go EVERY post in this forum with nothing more than your lame "cease and desist" comments is harrassment, Morkie, so why not follow your own advise, fatboy? Steve, K4YZ |
Mountains and Mountains of Steves shit go the bathroom not the ngs
K4YZ wrote: an old friend tried to hide behind yet more profanity: cease and desist your harrassment |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in news:1155819374.098262.243510@
74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com: an old fraud wrote: wrote: You are the one who lied about their EME contacts and Army service. So STFU. Cease You are the one who lied about his Army service (as with everything else you claim), so you STFU! Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
an old fraud wrote: wrote: You are the one who lied about his Army service (as with everything else you claim), so you STFU! funny my references check out No, they don't. You were caught in a lie. |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 18 Aug 2006 05:43:15 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: You are the one who lied about his Army service (as with everything else you claim), so you STFU! funny my references check out No, they don't. You were caught in a lie. cease desists and grow up http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Mountains and Mountains of Steves shit go the bathroom not the ngs - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an old friend" wrote in news:1155731974.184012.303560
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com: K4YZ wrote: an old friend tried to hide behind yet more profanity: cease and desist your harrassment Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Mountains and Mountains of Markie Mularkie - Mark, Just ignore them.
"K4YZ" wrote in
oups.com: an old friend tried to hide behind yet more profanity: K4YZ wrote: om wrote: " Mountains and Mountains ofrobeson ####" just being accurate now You couldn't be accurate iof you had your last name changed to it. cease and desist your harrassment Your re-taggin go EVERY post in this forum with nothing more than your lame "cease and desist" comments is harrassment, Morkie, so why not follow your own advise, fatboy? Steve, K4YZ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Mountains and Mountains of Robeson shit - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an old friend" wrote in news:1155731595.969647.270250
@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: K4YZ wrote: wrote: " Mountains and Mountains ofrobeson ####" just being accurate now cease and desist your harrassment Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Mountains and Mountains ofrobeson shit - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 15 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: cease and desist http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: On 18 Aug 2006 05:43:15 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: You are the one who lied about his Army service (as with everything else you claim), so you STFU! funny my references check out No, they don't. You were caught in a lie. cease desists Hey, Markie, when are you going to post that picure of your shemale "wife" to prove he/she is a "female?" |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: cease and desist |
More Morkie Mularkie
|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages - Markie, Just ignore them.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
ups.com: wrote: On 18 Aug 2006 05:43:15 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: You are the one who lied about his Army service (as with everything else you claim), so you STFU! funny my references check out No, they don't. You were caught in a lie. cease desists Hey, Markie, when are you going to post that picure of your shemale "wife" to prove he/she is a "female?" Markie, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more or clean up your yard. SC |
More Morkie Mularkie
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com