On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote:

you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not
listen to them either

Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell
us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic
"representatives"?

never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to
the FCC

The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the
FCC thinks.

but indeed enlight me
what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is
colpitss type or hartley

Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various
types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no
understanding of it.

nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things

Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for
you.

why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as
long as it ocilates at the right freq?

Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look
for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone
to different problems.

your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement

And yours doesn't, I suppose.

STFU MORON! WHO **** CARES

Al Klein wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:


On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote:


you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not
listen to them either


Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell
us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic
"representatives"?


never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to
the FCC


The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the
FCC thinks.


but indeed enlight me
what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is
colpitss type or hartley


Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various
types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no
understanding of it.


nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things


Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for
you.


why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as
long as it ocilates at the right freq?


Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look
for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone
to different problems.


your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement


And yours doesn't, I suppose.


---
avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006
Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:29:36 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006
Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:30:10 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote:

you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not
listen to them either

Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell
us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic
"representatives"?

never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to
the FCC

The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the
FCC thinks.
agred in practice but you are the one going about therory
..

an old friendless cocksucker wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote:

you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not
listen to them either

Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell
us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic
"representatives"?

never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to
the FCC

The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the
FCC thinks.
agred in practice but you are the one going about therory

What the hell would you know, you are a no code beginner training wheel
ham who makes up EME contacts.

wrote:
cease and desist your harrassment

wrote:
cease and desist your harrassment

Markthe wrote:
On 16 Aug 2006 06:01:49 -0700,
wrote:


an old fraud wrote:
cease and desist your harrassment

AC5-Webproxy69.direcpc.com (66.82.9.86)

so?

So spamming like you are doing will make you lose that high speed
connection.

Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as " wrote:
waits around to spam, since he has no job:

On 16 Aug 2006 12:34:13 -0700, Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as " wrote:



AC5-Webproxy69.direcpc.com (66.82.9.86)


so?

So spamming like you are doing will make you lose that high speed
connection.

no spamm from me just responding your harrassment and Robeson


No, you are spamming.

Yes, he certainly is. You, on the other hand, post filth.

Now go relieve your shemale wife from sucking off
your daddy.

Is that the sort of idea which arouses you, Roger? Does it get you hot?

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote in
ink.net:

Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as " wrote:
waits around to spam, since he has no job:

On 16 Aug 2006 12:34:13 -0700, Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as
" wrote:



AC5-Webproxy69.direcpc.com (66.82.9.86)


so?

So spamming like you are doing will make you lose that high speed
connection.

no spamm from me just responding your harrassment and Robeson


No, you are spamming.

Yes, he certainly is. You, on the other hand, post filth.

Now go relieve your shemale wife from sucking off
your daddy.

Is that the sort of idea which arouses you, Roger? Does it get you hot?

Dave K8MN




Mark, Just ignore them.

They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you
follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up.

Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look
more stupid.

Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your
moon bounce some more.

SC

Dave Heil wrote:
Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as " wrote:
waits around to spam, since he has no job:

No, you are spamming.

Yes, he certainly is. You, on the other hand, post filth.
gee it hardly seems that way to Hughes net

Now go relieve your shemale wife from sucking off
your daddy.

Is that the sort of idea which arouses you, Roger? Does it get you hot?
obviously it does

Dave K8MN