Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:23 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 49
Default Let's take back ham radio!

On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed you're not.

----
In message .com,
makes a death threat when he writes "the mostly
ooccasion [sic] where where you might it will be seconds before you
die."
  #42   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:28 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 179
Default Let's take back ham radio!


get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed you're not.


ah but we are indeed we are almost the majority of ham now now

  #43   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 49
Default Let's take back ham radio!

On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed you're not.


ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now


Indeed you are.

----
In message om,
wrote "If I want a cock I go for a man if I
want pussy I go fo r a fmeale simple as that [sic]"
  #44   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 179
Default Let's take back ham radio!


get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 wrote:

get help wrote:


ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now


Indeed you are.

you are a forger poor loser

  #45   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 407
Default Let's take back ham radio!


"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham

wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed I'm not.

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42


Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42


'Nuff said.

www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com





  #46   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 11:59 PM posted to alt.cbs-sucks,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 407
Default Let's take back ham radio!


"get help" wrote in message
...
On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham

wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed you're not.


ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now


Indeed I am

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42


Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42


'Nuff said.


--
Great. An antagonistic dyslexic in a sea of ambiguous text.


  #47   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 12:06 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 49
Default Let's take back ham radio!

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:49:38 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


"an old freind" wrote in message
roups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham

wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed I'm a

poor forger


So why do you forge?

http://marksspamblog.blogspot.com

----
In message . com,
Mark Morgan replied "yes I did. your point?" when accused of
confessing publicly to having beer enemas.
  #48   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 12:07 AM posted to alt.flame.rednecks,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 407
Default Let's take back ham radio!


wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


"an old freind" wrote in message
roups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham

wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL


Indeed I'm am

yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42


Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42


'Nuff said.





  #49   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 12:08 AM posted to alt.flame.rednecks,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 530
Default Let's take back ham radio!


Not Lloyd wrote:

yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

yes you are a poor forger

  #50   Report Post  
Old August 28th 06, 02:23 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Let's take back ham radio!

The Kat wrote in
:

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:



WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread
in a SCANNER newsgroup??




Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.




Hey,

This thread is about CW and ham radio. You scanner assholes stay
out of it. Go find some police or fireman to listen to.

Sc
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 December 1st 04 05:09 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 September 24th 04 05:56 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 June 26th 04 01:42 AM
193 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 2 April 3rd 04 06:54 AM
183 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (30-MAR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 6 April 2nd 04 04:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017