LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 14th 06, 03:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.


wrote:
On 13 Sep 2006 16:59:53 -0700,
wrote:


wrote:
On 13 Sep 2006 16:42:44 -0700,
wrote:


Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

[snip]

There is a reason that the ARRL membership numbers are so abysmal even
though they are the only national amateur radio organization of any
consequence.


Yeah the same reason that 75% of the people I know don't belong to
organizations of whatever hobby they do participate in. They're just not
"joiners".

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

But this isn't stamp collecting or fly-tying. It isn't even soccer or
la crosse.

This is amateur radio where lives are saved and we are everybody's comm
back-up.

Don't you think we could get a little more participation?


have you noticed it is hobby when that serves to excuse something, and
a Service like the army or at least CAP when there is something being
promoted as vital it (like code testing)


A-yup. I notice it all.

How are we to "join" in an emergency when we cannot join in everday
life?


I know you did notice but the rest of the boozos need it pointed out


They have a very odd way of looking at the world.

I don't volonteer much myself becuase of Ham's Like Robeson and in a
real emergency my dad health is my first concern as well as the BS
"courses" they want to you take these days


I think the ARRL courses are probably good, though I haven't actually
seen them. Standardization of terms and procedures has to be a good
thing. The Fed, State, and Local governments are standardizing on the
FEMA NIMS/ICS protocol. If they want Fed money, that is.

Recall the thread where I asked if anyone here had actually taken any
of the ARRL courses???

I think I'm going to sign up for the antenna modelling course this
winter for an inside activity.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Antenna 58 September 17th 06 04:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? RLW General 3 August 26th 06 10:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? Slow Code Shortwave 42 August 23rd 06 03:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW? Buck Antenna 0 July 21st 06 08:29 AM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good [email protected] Antenna 0 April 25th 05 04:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017