| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
On 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
From: "N9OGL" Subject: Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass. Date: 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 54 Message-ID: . com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.124.136.231 That IP address belongs to illinois.net, an organization which lists its purpose as follows: "The Illinois Century Network (ICN) is a telecommunications backbone providing high speed access to data, video, and audio communication in schools and libraries, at colleges and universities, to public libraries and museums, and for local government and state agencies." Just like Wiseman, you have to go somewhere else (Charleston) to post. Did your friend kick you off his CTI connection at 12.156.121.130 or did CTI? |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com: wrote: N9OGL wrote: You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted and if I am breaking the rules they aren't going to change the rules because of one person broke the rules...only a CB operator would think that...No what I think it is, is your one of those little pussy beacon operators on that frequency and your ****ed off because some one broadcasting on that frequency instead of running a little pussy beacon.....oh well... Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" When I was a teenager, a "pussy beacon" was a metalflake blue Corvette with side pipes. Worked really well, too. Dance, Toad, DANCE! It's a low power beacon, operated by a moron who don't have the balls to run a real station. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A real station? A real station? ROFLMAO! You're funny. Ask your mom and dad to raise your allowance so you can buy better music. SC |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700, N9OGL wrote: From: "N9OGL" Subject: Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass. Date: 15 Sep 2006 10:46:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 54 Message-ID: . com NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.124.136.231 That IP address belongs to illinois.net, an organization which lists its purpose as follows: "The Illinois Century Network (ICN) is a telecommunications backbone providing high speed access to data, video, and audio communication in schools and libraries, at colleges and universities, to public libraries and museums, and for local government and state agencies." Just like Wiseman, you have to go somewhere else (Charleston) to post. Did your friend kick you off his CTI connection at 12.156.121.130 or did CTI? No, he's gone for the week....went down to missouri. He wouldn't be back till next Saturday. plus the library is a lot closer to my house then he is. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in oups.com: wrote: N9OGL wrote: You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted and if I am breaking the rules they aren't going to change the rules because of one person broke the rules...only a CB operator would think that...No what I think it is, is your one of those little pussy beacon operators on that frequency and your ****ed off because some one broadcasting on that frequency instead of running a little pussy beacon.....oh well... Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" When I was a teenager, a "pussy beacon" was a metalflake blue Corvette with side pipes. Worked really well, too. Dance, Toad, DANCE! It's a low power beacon, operated by a moron who don't have the balls to run a real station. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A real station? A real station? ROFLMAO! You're funny. Ask your mom and dad to raise your allowance so you can buy better music. SC IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT ON THE STATION THEN DON'T LISTEN...IT'S THAT SIMPLE.....OH YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO OPERATE A RADIO...ONLY A PUSSY ASS CW TRANSMITTER!!! TODD N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in oups.com: wrote: N9OGL wrote: You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted and if I am breaking the rules they aren't going to change the rules because of one person broke the rules...only a CB operator would think that...No what I think it is, is your one of those little pussy beacon operators on that frequency and your ****ed off because some one broadcasting on that frequency instead of running a little pussy beacon.....oh well... Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" When I was a teenager, a "pussy beacon" was a metalflake blue Corvette with side pipes. Worked really well, too. Dance, Toad, DANCE! It's a low power beacon, operated by a moron who don't have the balls to run a real station. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA A real station? A real station? ROFLMAO! You're funny. Ask your mom and dad to raise your allowance so you can buy better music. SC IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT ON THE STATION THEN DON'T LISTEN...IT'S THAT SIMPLE.....OH YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO OPERATE A RADIO...ONLY A PUSSY ASS CW TRANSMITTER!!! TODD N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB I'm trying to hear a CW beacon on 13.555.50 and your ****ty songs are making me gag. SC |
slow code stalker at large
Slow Code wrote: " slow code stalker at large |
slow code stalker at large
Jonathan wrote: I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? try a basic map asshole |
slow code stalker at large
Not Lloyd wrote: slow code stalker at large |
slow code stalker at large
Not Lloyd wrote: ..slow code stalker at large |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
and linking though other otwwn is hardly uncommon in centrel ILL when I lived in Illioispolis the IP madelook like I was mdiway way between deactur and Charasleton I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? |
slow code stalker at large
Not Lloyd wrote: slow code stalker at large |
slow code stalker at large
I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? try a basic map asshole www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com |
slow code stalker at large
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Jonathan wrote: I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? try a basic map asshole .. I would try a basic map, provided you try basic English. |
slow code stalker at large
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Not Lloyd wrote: slow code stalker at large The Myna bird has left his droppings.... |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"Jonathan" anonone@anon wrote in message ... and linking though other otwwn is hardly uncommon in centrel ILL when I lived in Illioispolis the IP madelook like I was mdiway way between deactur and Charasleton I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? While most people can unscramble Decatur and Charleston and locate them, Illiopolis could be a problem if you are not familiar with small towns in Illinois. It's just west of Decatur. I'm not quite sure how far though as I never had occasion to go there. I once lived in Niantic, a small town between Decatur and Illiopolis. Dee, N8UZE |
slow code stalker at large
Dee Flint wrote: "Jonathan" anonone@anon wrote in message ... While most people can unscramble Decatur and Charleston and locate them, Illiopolis could be a problem if you are not familiar with small towns in Illinois. It's just west of Decatur. I'm not quite sure how far though as I never had occasion to go there. I once lived in Niantic, a small town between Decatur and Illiopolis. interesting and explains a lot Dee, N8UZE |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"Dee Flint" wrote in message . .. "Jonathan" anonone@anon wrote in message ... and linking though other otwwn is hardly uncommon in centrel ILL when I lived in Illioispolis the IP madelook like I was mdiway way between deactur and Charasleton I am not familiar with, nor have I heard of the locations Mark mentioned, so I did a Google map search of "deactur and Charasleton" and found nothing. Now I'm wondering where "Illioispolis" may be? It is somewhere in Mark's clouded mind, but who knows where? While most people can unscramble Decatur and Charleston and locate them, Illiopolis could be a problem if you are not familiar with small towns in Illinois. It's just west of Decatur. I'm not quite sure how far though as I never had occasion to go there. I once lived in Niantic, a small town between Decatur and Illiopolis. Dee, N8UZE ... I guess "most" people could unscramble them, yes, but then, "most" people spell correctly, thus making unscrambling unnecessary. With Mark, who can't spell a two letter word correcectly, I have neither your pity or understanding. |
slow code stalker at large
Not Lloyd wrote: " slow code stalker at large |
slow code stalker at large
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "Jonathan" anonone@anon wrote in message ... While most people can unscramble Decatur and Charleston and locate them, Illiopolis could be a problem if you are not familiar with small towns in Illinois. It's just west of Decatur. I'm not quite sure how far though as I never had occasion to go there. I once lived in Niantic, a small town between Decatur and Illiopolis. interesting and explains a lot but i rfuse to get spll check bcauuse im simply lazy www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:06:46 -0400, wrote:
Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. Enjoy your all expenses paid trip to Guantanamo courtesy of Homeland Security. why? thousand if not millions in this coutry do exactly that They do it on radio? That must be tough in a country with 14,000 stations, most of which are not religious. Rich |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it took so long to cuff you! Todd N9OGL SMEGMA SCUM RADIO Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought you two would like to keep close company! Message-ID: .com KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Lloyd Daugherty wrote: Just like Wiseman, you have to go somewhere else (Charleston) to post. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA Llardass ****s up again! |
gay bashers are not welcome anywhere that is why they use fake names like Slow Code
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it took so long to cuff you! Todd N9OGL SMEGMA SCUM RADIO Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought you two would like to keep close company! Message-ID: .com KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it took so long to cuff you! Todd N9OGL SMEGMA SCUM RADIO Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought you two would like to keep close company! Message-ID: .com KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy" There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy! Quoted Word For Word! Steve, K4YZ hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB hay tood did ur dad trheaten two knot pay teh intranet bill lkie mine do sum time? teh last time daddy pull taht stunt I didnot feed him four amlost a week an taht made him cahang his toon rael quick my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ LEAVE Mark alone! K? N0VFP |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com: wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB Todd, One song I haven't heard on Omega One: "Jail House Rock" You might want to get used to hearing that one. SC |
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public...And Morkie Moron Helps Him Out
|
N9OGL Continues To Make a Fool Out Of Himself In Public
Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ups.com: wrote: On 21 Sep 2006 12:25:00 -0700, "N9OGL" wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so...(SNIP) So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared to silence you. Oooooooooooooooops! The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation particulars. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS! Prove it!!! he can't prove anything YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME! Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing window. right YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE! What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you should be a licensee either. no I think even ****ed up pieces of **** like Steve have rights OTOH I think you have at least as much right as he does I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over and over and over........ So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal. and why not use the avalble avenues as you have done http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com there isn't many "avenues" left....this is it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB Todd, One song I haven't heard on Omega One: "Jail House Rock" You might want to get used to hearing that one. Speaking from first hand experience? Maybe you can give him pointers in being a prison bitch. |
show-na-to-va (that is the greeting for this time of year as a JEW rendered phonicticaly)
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...: stop the lying if you have a point engage in deabte civl deabte would be nice but we don't expect miracles I've engaged the "points". Morkie. no you have have stop lying show-na-to-va (that is the greeting for this time of year as a JEW rendered phonicticaly) happy new years it means and it can be better one if Wismen Robson and SC a few just decided to not to be as hateful |
KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com