| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
This could get interesting. Sc |
trolling right along
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think We already know that, Toad! |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just finehis ass.
Roger Wiseman, giddy from exposure to lunar light from the full moon and
posing as " wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: We already know that, Toad! you know nothing about anything woger That is a double negative, dumbass, you just admitted Roger knows everything about everything. BWHAHAHAHA markie ****s up as usual! Pssssst! Roger! It isn't a double negative. I'll bet you feel like a complete fool. Dave K8MN |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
ps.com: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB ROFLMAO They don't have to explain anything, you'll be the one to have to explain to them that you're sorry for the pirating with excessive power levels and that you promise never to do it again. SC |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ps.com: They don't have to explain anything, Wrong again Slow Code they have explain where Todd violated the rules I know you have no respect for the document but the consitition requires due process Hey Stupid, I got N9OGL's Omega One pirate station at S-4 and can hear every ****ty song Todd is playing with no effort at all, even with the attenuator in. Excessive power is a violation of the rule. N9OGL's due process is the full body cavity search they'll give him just before they throw him in the prison with AB8MQ if he don't pay the NAL when they slap his ass with it. SC |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ps.com: Lloyd Daugherty wrote: On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Slow Code wrote: This could get interesting. Sc they will do neither... They will do both ... I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts, they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do. They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to go the courts to explain themselves. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB ROFLMAO They don't have to explain anything, you'll be the one to have to explain to them that you're sorry for the pirating with excessive power levels and that you promise never to do it again. SC come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know ****!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just finehis ass.
Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:
Slow Code wrote: Hey, cumguzzler, AB8MQ isn't in prison nor has he ever been in one, unlike prison BITCH Paris. You're quite right, Roger. You've only been held in a cell locally; you've not been in prison. You might want to tone down your corrections though. Think nice thoughts about lilacs and autumn leaves and singing birds. You're going to have to slow down on these wild accusations. Why, earlier, you stated that "slow code" was Lloyd Davies. Now how can he be Lloyd Davies and someone named Paris? Think nice thoughts. Dave K8MN |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com: come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know ****!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB **** IS WHAT YOU CAN HEAR ON 13.556 LSB. IMPROVE YOUR PROGRAMMING GOD DAMN IT! sc |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Slow code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ups.com: come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know ****!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB **** IS WHAT YOU CAN HEAR ON 13.556 LSB. IMPROVE YOUR PROGRAMMING GOD DAMN IT! sc What do you want to hear??? Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. Enjoy your all expenses paid trip to Guantanamo courtesy of Homeland Security. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... Slow code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ups.com: come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know ****!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB **** IS WHAT YOU CAN HEAR ON 13.556 LSB. IMPROVE YOUR PROGRAMMING GOD DAMN IT! sc What do you want to hear??? Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. your suppose to sing them, do it the right way or Allah will get you. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote in
ups.com: Slow code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in ups.com: come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know ****!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB **** IS WHAT YOU CAN HEAR ON 13.556 LSB. IMPROVE YOUR PROGRAMMING GOD DAMN IT! sc What do you want to hear??? Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 LSB So when you die in a shootout with the infidel FCC, you get 72 virgins? Pervert!! Sc |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
"N9OGL" wrote
come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass, THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who probably [rant deleted] I'm sure the FCC considered them. Here's how it probably went: Assistant to FCC Section Chief: "Hey, boss, we just got some requests for LPTV waivers from some guy in Illinois named Todd Daugherty." FCC Section Chief: "Todd...who? Oh, yeah...HIM again. Isn't he the guy who calls us all sorts of names on the Internet and brags about being a pirate?" Assistant: "Let me get the file...yeah, that's him, all right. Real pain in the ass. What do you want to do about his requests?" Chief: "File 'em. Right over there (points to big gray object in corner)." Assistant: "But, Chief, that's the paper shredder...oh, I get it (snicker)!" The point, Toad, is that "shall consider" does not mean "must grant." As usual, you read into things what you want them to mean and then you get mad at the world when the world doesn't read them the same way you do. And another, thing, Toad. When dealing with a Federal agency you have to explain yourself to them; they don't have to explain themselves to you. No, it isn't fair, but that's just the way it is. But that's your problem. You just can't accept that there are things you can't control. What do you want to hear??? Tommorrow I'm going to start reading passages out of the Koran. Slow Code said: So when you die in a shootout with the infidel FCC, you get 72 virgins? Does the Koran specify the gender of these virgins? Toad probably interprets the Koran the same way he interprets Part 15 - "it means what I say it means, not what it says." |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
BTW DUMBASS THE LETTER I GOT FROM THE ****ING FCC DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING THAT THEY CONSIDER MY ****ING WAIVER AGAIN **** THE FCC AND MOST IMPORTANT....**** YOU!!!!!! (The Letter that the Todd got from the FCC) http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: BTW DUMBASS THE LETTER I GOT FROM THE ****ING FCC DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING THAT THEY CONSIDER MY ****ING WAIVER AGAIN **** THE FCC AND MOST IMPORTANT....**** YOU!!!!!! Toad, do you really kiss your mommy after sex with that mouth? Or did you learn it from her? (The Letter that the Todd got from the FCC) http://12.156.121.130/n9ogl.htm That NAL is coming, Toad. They also want to look into your past actions, those character isuues, to remain a commission licensee! |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: DUMBASS I APPLIED LONG BEFORE I STARTED BRAGGING I WAS A ####### PIRATE AND DID THAT OTHER #### ...SO #### YOU....YOU DON'T KNOW ####!!!! Sounds like Toad's bound and determined to commit slow-motion suicide. Hey, whatever turns you on, Toad. What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. But you don't care about that, do you? This is typical sociopathic behavior - to hell with everybody else as long as I get what I want. |
You people stop trashing Omega One. Todd's mom is getting mad.
"N9OGL" wrote in
oups.com: BTW DUMBASS THE LETTER I GOT FROM THE ****ING FCC DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING THAT THEY CONSIDER MY ****ING WAIVER AGAIN **** THE FCC AND MOST IMPORTANT....**** YOU!!!!!! (The Letter that the Todd got from the FCC) Why do you speak in the third person? Are you Todd's mother? LOL! SC |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
You people stop trashing Omega One. Todd's mom is getting mad.
Slow Code wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in oups.com: BTW DUMBASS THE LETTER I GOT FROM THE ****ING FCC DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING THAT THEY CONSIDER MY ****ING WAIVER AGAIN **** THE FCC AND MOST IMPORTANT....**** YOU!!!!!! (The Letter that the Todd got from the FCC) Why do you speak in the third person? Are you Todd's mother? LOL! SC Why do you talk like Stebie?? or perhaps your sucking his dick, so he can teach you to be a asshole |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted and if I am breaking the rules they aren't going to change the rules because of one person broke the rules...only a CB operator would think that...No what I think it is, is your one of those little pussy beacon operators on that frequency and your ****ed off because some one broadcasting on that frequency instead of running a little pussy beacon.....oh well... Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" When I was a teenager, a "pussy beacon" was a metalflake blue Corvette with side pipes. Worked really well, too. Dance, Toad, DANCE! |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Brenda Ann wrote: -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! "N9OGL" wrote in message ups.com... wrote: N9OGL wrote: DUMBASS I APPLIED LONG BEFORE I STARTED BRAGGING I WAS A ####### PIRATE AND DID THAT OTHER #### ...SO #### YOU....YOU DON'T KNOW ####!!!! Sounds like Toad's bound and determined to commit slow-motion suicide. Hey, whatever turns you on, Toad. What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted That's for sure.. look at what they have done to Part 15 to allow for BPL... that's worse than any 50 pirates. Yeah and I have a feeling in a few more years they will make it lease restrictive, if the FCC gets it way with BPL and a few other technologies coming out. Todd N9OGL |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
Brenda Ann wrote: What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted That's for sure.. look at what they have done to Part 15 to allow for BPL... that's worse than any 50 pirates. No argument. But remember: the BPL crowd has the Electronic Industries Association and quite a few cubic yards of money behind it. Part 15 experimenters don't have nearly that kind of clout. With the FCC, money talks and BS walks. They could very easily rewrite Part 15 to prohibit any kind of experimentation not specifically authorized by the FCC, meaning, pay big bucks for a special authorization. It's the little guys like us who will take it in the shorts like always. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: What's irritating is that when the FCC takes you down they'll probably rewrite Part 15 to be even more restrictive than it is. In that case, NOBODY wins. You have no proof of that, your just assuming and that don't mean ****, the fact is Part 15 has over the years beocme very relaxed instead of be restricted That's for sure.. look at what they have done to Part 15 to allow for BPL... that's worse than any 50 pirates. No argument. But remember: the BPL crowd has the Electronic Industries Association and quite a few cubic yards of money behind it. Part 15 experimenters don't have nearly that kind of clout. With the FCC, money talks and BS walks. They could very easily rewrite Part 15 to prohibit any kind of experimentation not specifically authorized by the FCC, meaning, pay big bucks for a special authorization. It's the little guys like us who will take it in the shorts like always. No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. Here's some interesting read ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Mass_M...tion/74-87.pdf Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
|
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. Unwanted fields? Sounds like they had Omega One in mind when they wrote the regulations. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: Hey, Toad, exactly what is a "pussy beacon?" It's a low power beacon, operated by a moron who don't have the balls to run a real station. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yeah, you have to be a real man to flagrantly violate the rules and brag about it on the Internet. In the real world that's called "stupidity." |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
N9OGL wrote: No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. You didn't get the point (but, then, you rarely do). What I meant was that they could easily rewrite Part 15 or any other rule to restrict experimenting even further. We don't want that. You bring up a good question, though. If it's so cheap and easy to get an experimental license, why didn't you get one for your operation on 13.556 MHz? Then this entire discussion would be moot. |
Do you think they will revoke N9OGL's ham license or just fine his ass.
wrote: N9OGL wrote: No that's what they have Part 5 for. Part 5 is a experimental license for experimenting. read the rules. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...7cfrv1_05.html BTW an Experimental License isn't that much, I believe it's around $55 dollars, hell anyone can afford that! Part 15 wasn't really in reality designed for experimenting or broadcasting it was designed to regulated unwanted fields. You didn't get the point (but, then, you rarely do). What I meant was that they could easily rewrite Part 15 or any other rule to restrict experimenting even further. We don't want that. no dumbass YOU don't get the point Part 15 wasn't designed for experimenting, it was designed for unwanted field emissions like what a computer radiates off, or off type accepted transmitter. Cordless phones and BPL are two other thing govern by Part 15 but if you read ALL of part 15 that is what part 15 is for. If you want to experiment get an experimental license. Don't come on here and claim "oh, he's breaking the law, now the FCC is going to tighten the rules governing part 15, in reality they are NOT going to change the rules because one person breaks the rules.You seem to lack understanding on that and I'm not going to debate it with someone who has no understanding of it. Because I'll tell you what a number of people has broken Part 15 over the years and has been busted by the FCC (see Dugan V FCC, Dugan was running a pirate radio station on the FM broadcast band and was busted by the FCC who claimed he was in violation of Part 15, the US Court of Appeal up held it) Did the FCC change the rule after Dugan or any other pirate on the FM band after the FCC busted them for violating Part 15?? Answer NO, the rule has remained the same before and after all those pirates has been busted. Your claim that the FCC will tighten the rules because I might be violating Part 15 doesn't hold water. I suggest before you get on here and claim something that you better do some deep research into the matter. You bring up a good question, though. If it's so cheap and easy to get an experimental license, why didn't you get one for your operation on 13.556 MHz? Then this entire discussion would be moot. Because you can't get an experimental license for Broadcasting, many people has tried. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com