Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Thurs, Oct 5 2006 7:20 pm
wrote: From: on Tues, Oct 3 2006 3:25 pm wrote: From: Nada Tapu on Sat, Sep 30 2006 2:23 pm On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:56:08 -0400, wrote: 1. The "official" 'Radiogram' form sold by the ARRL for use in "official" message relay by amateurs. Obvious play-acting AS IF the amateur relay was by "official" means a la Western Union or similar REAL telegraphic message. :-) Why must the format be sold? Is it copy righted? If I send a message using THE FORMAT without purchasing the form, am I guilty of copyright infringement? Big Brother of Newington will ruler-spank you. 2. The monotonic HI HI HI on voice to denote a 'laugh.' Done with little or no inflection and hardly normal to genuine laughter. [jargon from telegraphic shorthand where inflection and tonality of real laughter is not possible] Hi, hi! Ho, ho! Beep, beep... 3. Gratuitous signal level and readability "reports" to other stations AS IF they were solidly received when they are not. You're 59, OM. "FB, OM." 4. Carrying over many, many "Q" code three-letter shorthands from telegraphy on voice where the plain words would have worked just as well. Jargon use has the appearance of being a "professional" service but it is just jargon, a juxtaposition of short-hand used in different modes. QSL. QRT. 5. The seeming inability to express anything but in a flat monotone on voice, despite the subject (if any) under discussion. Most of the time such voice contacts seem devoid of the transmitting operator's ability to convey any emotion beyond boredom. Roger. "Roger who?" 6. The over-use of call signs instead of legal names in non-radio conversation, communication, and image displays...AS IF the license grantee were a REAL radio station or radio broadcaster. Every 10 minutes. "We now pause 10 seconds for official station identification." 7. The non-radio self-definition of a licensee as being "federally authorized radio station (or operator or both)." Elevation of self-importance beyond what the amateur radio license GRANT is about. 10-4. Roger that. Affirmative. Over and out. 8. The non-acceptance of the word "hobby" for the real activity of radio amateurs AS IF they were somehow a national service to the country. Authenticate. "Official" 9. The falsity of redefining the word "service" (amateur radio service, were 'service' means a type and kind of radio activity of all) into that "national service" akin to anything from a para-military occupation to an important "resource" that would always "save the day when all other infrastructure communications services 'failed'." Amateur Radio Service = GI Bill. ARRL chief a member of Joint Chiefs of Staff. 10. The falsity of assuming that amateur radio is PRIMARILY an "emergency" communications resource. Regardless of the pomposity of many self-righteous amateurs and thousands of words and redefinitions written, the amateur radio service is still an avocational radio activity done for personal pleasure WITHOUT pecuniary compensation. "Sorry Jim, MARS is Amateur Radio." As Pluto went so may MARS... Amateur radio is among the least formal radio services I know. Besides listening-only to radio broadcasting service, what DO you "know" about OTHER radio services? Other than reading about the amateur radio service in WWII, what does Jim know about THE Service? He consults Pentagon library of morsemen. You know NOTHING of military radio. You never served, never worked with the military. I did both as a soldier and as a civilian. Jim knows nothing of military radio. Except surplus he read about. You know NOTHING about any form of broadcasting from the transmitting end or even studio/location procedures and technology. I've been involved with broadcasting at the station end since 1956. I suspect that Jim was an Extra in "Pump Up The Volume." He not listed in SEG, Screen Extras Guild. You know NOTHING of Public Land Mobile Radio Services, never had one. I did. When you was LMR, Jim was VFR. CAVU...(Code Allatime Very Universal) You know NOTHING of Aircraft Radio Service, protocal or procedures, or of actual air-air or air-ground comms. I've done that, both air-air and air-ground. Maybe Jim wasn't VFR. IFR. Intermittent Fantasy Regaler. You know NOTHING of Maritime Radio Service, what goes on and what is used. I've used it on the water, both in harbors and inland waterways. Jim is on CH16. Hot water? You MIGHT know something of Citizens Band Radio Service. CBers out-number amateurs by at least 4:1, could be twice that. I've been doing that since 1959. Jim is on CH19. 10-4. You MIGHT know something about Personal Communications Radio Services other than CB (R-C is not strictly a communications mode, it is tele-command)...such as a cellular telephone. No "call letters," "Q" codes, or radiotelegraphy are used with cell phones. One in three Americans has one. Do you have one. I do. You can reach Jim at XXX-XXX-XXXX. He X rated now? Too many olde-tymers want to PRETEND they are pros in front of their ham rigs. Not true, Len. We're amateurs Don't you forget it. Yowsa! :-) I have USED my COMMERCIAL radio operator license to operate on FAR MORE EM SPECTRUM than is allocated to amateurs. LEGAL operation. In most cases of such work NO license was required by the contracting government agency. [the FCC regulates only CIVIL radio services in the USA, NOT the government's use] Jim isn't involved in Gov't Radio. But he reads about it. Knows all. Allatime calls others "wrong." When did YOU "legally" operate below 500 KHz? Have you EVER operated on frequencies in the microwave region? [other than causing 2.4 GHz EMI from your microwave oven] Have you transmitted ANY RF energy as high as 25 GHz? I have transmitted RF from below LF to 25 GHz. I have done that since 1953...53 years ago. Jim's Giga Hurts. Let's take up collection to send him Preparation H. What would you have me "take advantage of" in "good chunks" of the EM spectrum? "Work DX at 10 GHz?!?" :-) :-) :-) I prefer smooth. Peanuts. I've once "worked" 250,000 miles (approximately) "DX" with a far-away station above 2 GHz but below 10 GHz. What have YOU done above 3/4 meters? READ about it? Jim once incorrectly calculated the distance to the moon. I think maybe Coslo aided him with the calculations. Coslonaut helped Giganaut. Oh, yes, now you are going to "reply" with the standard ruler-spank that I did not do that with "my own" equipment. :-) You should have gotten a QSL manager and with the greenstamps earned, bought both sides of the QSO. My bad. I QRK and QSY both. Well, now YOU have a quandry. To use that stock "reply" of yours you MUST define that the "taxpayer SUBSIDIZES" anything of the government or contracted work by the government. In your "logic" then, I really DO "own" that equipment! I suspect that Jim is subsidized in many ways. Must be...he never subsides. But, if you say I don't then you have to take back your INSULT to all military servicemen and servicewomen that they "receive a SUBSIDY from the taxpayer." I will NOT "own that equipment" if you take that insult back. Perhaps Jim will loan you some tube-type equipment ... I have tubular capacitors for hollow-state things, cathode ray tubes on a hot tin roof. YOU don't think your remark was an "insult." You've tried to rationalize your way out of that three ways from Sunday since. Well then, I "do" "own" that equipment and did get experience using "my own" equipment! Jim insulted me. Jim insulted Hans. Jim insulted Mark. Jim insulted Len. Jim did not insult Dave who apparently thinks little of his service. Is that why his Giga hurts? YOU are NOT young, Jimmie. Face it. You've hit the halfway mark and are downhill all the way since. YOU are MIDDLE-AGED, growing older. YOU never "pioneered radio" in your life. All you did was try to fit in to the present...and then rationalized by implication that you somehow did some "pioneering." But, but, but he has greenlee punches... He is punchy. You imply that you are "superior" because of achieving an amateur extra class license largely through a test for morsemanship. Manual radiotelegraphy hasn't been "pioneered" by you. Jim is a follower. Camp. The transistor was invented in 1948 - 58 years ago. 1947. The PATENT wasn't granted immediately. :-) Owch!!! I guess that was before the days of instant gratification. Also before instant oatmeal and regularity. Amateurs were using them in receivers and transmitters by the late 1950s. Early. Like 1952. See QST or CQ (forget which) which I saw at Fort Monmouth in that year. Transistors made by Philco (?). Whatever it was, the transistors have long been obsolete, out of production, replaced by newer, better, cheaper types. Do they require greenlee punches? How about we give him nice Hawaiian Punch? Come back when you've actually DESIGNED some solid-state ham radio, not just assembled a kit designed by someone else. Plans from a Ham Radio magazine. Prior to 1980... Use those mighty collitch degrees, all that radio- electronics "experience" in the "industry" to show us what you can really do. :-) He can post attrition numbers on hobby radio. Cribbed from Joe Speroni's website... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |