Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 12:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 12:29 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?


Slow Code wrote:

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC


A useless ham asks a useless question...

(Other r.r.a... groups removed from my reply to reduce spam as
requested by a real ham who doesn't ask useless questions)

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 29th 06, 12:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?

wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC


A useless ham asks a useless question...



How is the code practice coming along or have you decided to stay on CB?

SC

  #4   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 01:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?

I'm relatively new to the group, but I can already tell you're the group
troll.

Having been active in the rec.photo groups for sometime, I understand
trolls, but at least you have a beef with something tangible.

Let's face it. You most likely are one of those who got their General at 13
WPM, maybe their Extra at 20 and hate the no coders and those who got their
license by only taking code at 5WPM. Well, who cares. It's time for you to
accept reality and come to the conclusion, you out lived Morse Code. Get on
with life.

Jim Philopena
KB1NXE - Formerly KA1VGP, DA2PJ and WN1VJW

If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out
live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust.


"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC



  #5   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 01:37 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?


James Philopena wrote:

If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out
live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust.


Welcome. I've always said that a healthy application of the actuarial
tables will take care of most of the grumblers...



  #6   Report Post  
Old September 29th 06, 12:45 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,294
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?


wrote:
On 26 Sep 2006 17:37:25 -0700,
wrote:


James Philopena wrote:

If you have a Call Book with that last one in it, you have definitely out
live Morse Code - time to get back to ashes and dust.


Welcome. I've always said that a healthy application of the actuarial
tables will take care of most of the grumblers...

SOON PLEASE


You'll be right in there, Spammer!

  #9   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 02:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 286
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?

On 9/26/06 4:15 PM, in article
et, "Slow Code"
wrote:

Or is it like talking to someone on CB?

SC


No, not at all. There is a lot less cussing, spitting, passing of gas into
the mike, usually no electronic sound effects, and rarely a "10-4 good
buddy." I'd say the average ham has an 80 point higher IQ, than the average
Cber.

Don

  #10   Report Post  
Old September 27th 06, 02:49 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Default Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?


Slow Code wrote:
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?



If the applicable FCC rules and good amateur operating practice are
followed, it's a real QSO.

Why wouldn't it be?



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? Dirk Policy 1057 December 21st 06 01:29 PM
Lest We Forget [email protected] Policy 151 April 24th 05 09:45 PM
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner DeWayne Scanner 143 November 23rd 03 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017