Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Iitoi wrote: Dee Flint Wrote: There is nothing there that is harmful to CW in the least. Imagine this. Imagine all the CW and digital NTS traffic nets that now operate in the 150KHz between 3600 and 3750, relocated down to the 75KHz between 3525 and 3600. Imagine all the PSK and RTTY operators also relocated down there. Imagine the Canadian SSB nets migrating down there to avoid the US extras and Advanced. Imagine the folks already operating there welcoming them with open arms --- NOT!. Then imagine it is a domestic contest weekend, like SS or FD! What could be the harm to CW? In a sense the 3600Khz "band edge" simply "aligns" the traditional 80M CW operating space with those spaces on 40 & 20. Both of which are ~100Khz wide as will be the case on 80. The sky never fell on 40 and 20 CW and it won't fall on 80 CW either. w3rv The Man in the Maze QRM from Baboquivari Peak, AZ -- Iitoi |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hi Guys. First Time Poster | Shortwave | |||
i confess | CB | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |