![]() |
|
Mark's Blog has no visitors
I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor
comments. Not a single one. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Your blog is kind of like when you were a kid being chosen for sandlot baseball and you were always the last one chosen. You were "there" but invisible. Now I see why you tout your blog as part of your sig, but really Mark, you should cease doing so. How long will it take you to get the hint that nobody is interested? Huh? You and your blog are simply not interesting. Boredom comes to mind. Perhaps if you weren't such a spammer/idiot, if you had something to say that was pertinent to the topics at hand you'd be taken more seriously. You don't. As a result, Mark, you've been relegated to the Kill Files of most of the Usenet visitors. I wonder why? Would 100 or more daily posts have anything to do with it? Would stalking Steve have any bearing on why you have been Killfiled? Yet you persist day in and day out. Your excuse? You claim you are defending your "virtue". Pure poppycock, Mark. You have no virtue to defend. You have no "good name" to defend. You are an idiot, Mark. Pure and simple. The only reason that Len responds to you is that Len feels sorry for you. Len feels he is doing you a favor in his condescending way. Len responds to you, you answer. Len feels good because he is doing his part to lend credence to a known idiot and all the while Len views you as a mental inferior. You are his "pet puppy" for the time being. He pats you on the head and you happily wag your tail. Apparently Lennie is more than familiar with the Pavlovian response. |
Mark's Blog has no visitors
NOVFP Pizzas4Wog@anon wrote in message ... I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor comments. Poor lardass lloyd davies up all saturday night trolling usenet newsgroups. What a no life loser. http://i9.tinypic.com/2mnhkbk.jpg |
Mark's Blog has no visitors
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:46:07 -0400, stuttered:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:55:11 -0500, "Not Lloyd" Pizzas4Wog@anon wrote: I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor comments. Not a single one. Zero. Zilch. Nada. well since coments are moderated the only coment you would get to see are ones I allowed many vistor coments have existed I simply found to to be harrassing that I choose not allow you to use the blog for futher harrasment does not mean it ha no vistors It's the same thing. No comments means no one will bother to comment further. Furthermore, they don't come back to your "blog" because it's a waste of time. you really could use to learn how to use english PKB. http:/STOMP! http://marksspamblog.blogspot.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Too cheap to pay for a real news server, aren't you? |
id theft is a crime
Lloyd Morgan wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:46:07 -0400, stuttered: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:55:11 -0500, "Not Lloyd" Pizzas4Wog@anon wrote: I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor comments. Not a single one. Zero. Zilch. Nada. well since coments are moderated the only coment you would get to see are ones I allowed many vistor coments have existed I simply found to to be harrassing that I choose not allow you to use the blog for futher harrasment does not mean it ha no vistors It's the same thing. no it is is not if you ever want to discuss something you can start by being even vaguely honest |
id theft is a crime
N9OGL wrote: wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:55:11 -0500, "Not Lloyd" Pizzas4Wog@anon wrote: I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor comments. Not a single one. Zero. Zilch. Nada. well since coments are moderated the only coment you would get to see are ones I allowed many vistor coments have existed I simply found to to be harrassing that I choose not allow you to use the blog for futher harrasment does not mean it ha no vistors you really could use to learn how to use english http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com I know what you mean...I'm looking to shut down my comment section...beacuse people posting the same thing over and over and simply harassing me...so i'm going to shut it down (the comment section not the blog) if they continue. I use the moderate coment setting ymself I see em before any body else and most are simple deleted these day "not loyd is just ****ed that I don't allow my blog as a platfrom for harrasment as well as RRap Todd N9OGL |
cock theft is a crime,marqueer!
wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:13:02 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd Morgan wrote: On 15 Oct 2006 13:05:14 -0700, an_old_friend drooled: Lloyd Morgan wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:46:07 -0400, stuttered: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:55:11 -0500, "Not Lloyd" Pizzas4Wog@anon wrote: I just looked at your blog, Mark. I noted that NOBODY has made any visitor comments. Not a single one. Zero. Zilch. Nada. well since coments are moderated the only coment you would get to see are ones I allowed many vistor coments have existed I simply found to to be harrassing that I choose not allow you to use the blog for futher harrasment does not mean it ha no vistors It's the same thing. no it is is not Indeed it is. nope nor do I especaly care if you visit or not http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
cock theft is a crime,marqueer!
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:24:10 -0700, bill_newport.4land did most oddly
state: Only if one is organ-legging. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5 Demon Lord of Confusion COOSN-029-06-71069 Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.* Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered! "Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring, and well-read? A: A tourist." -- Anonymous "It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine.. 'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur reached new heights, in Message-ID: "Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H. L. Mencken "Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other part of the so-called 'War on Terror.' "If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them up." -- William Rivers Pitt |
id theft is crime
The God of Odd Statements wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:24:10 -0700, bill_newport.4land did most oddly state: Only if one is organ-legging. not a bad rejioner of course you are not likely to see this reply |
cock theft is a crime,marqueer!
"The God of Odd Statements" wrote in message eyours... On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:24:10 -0700, bill_newport.4land did most oddly state: Only if one is organ-legging. -- __1) I was draft into the US Army. 2) I is a member of the Chemcal Cops. 3) The military wont let me retire. 4) I dosn't serve under the name 'Mark Morgan but that's okay cuz the FBI, DOD, and CIA have all told me I cando it. 5) I is on-the-lam from stalking former marines and fatal attraction ex-shemale 6) I was recently, paying $5/hr. to access my ISP 7) I has a 248 IQ, but can't figure out how to use a spell checker. 8) I is a bi-sexual Pagan male ham who like to be spanked. 9) I can't find any action on the military base in Central IL, so I hav to ask people on USENET. with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling do u hav anyting cognet two say? my blog http://www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com/ __________________________________________________ ____________________ Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5 Demon Lord of Confusion COOSN-029-06-71069 Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.* Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered! "Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring, and well-read? A: A tourist." -- Anonymous "It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine.. 'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur reached new heights, in Message-ID: "Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H. L. Mencken "Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other part of the so-called 'War on Terror.' "If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them up." -- William Rivers Pitt -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com