Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
|
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
RadioGuy wrote: In article et, says... Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC I'm not Chris and I don't have no code license you idiot!!!!!!!!!! I'm a General Class and I know code. You're just an idiot! hey chris.........get over here and suck my tits as marqueer runs his tongue on my cock |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article et, says... Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC I'm not Chris and I don't have no code license you idiot!!!!!!!!!! I'm a General Class and I know code. You're just an idiot! Sure, whatever you say Chris. How's your code practice coming along? SC |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
|
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
bradvk2qq wrote: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ same for the USA as anyone that lisitens to 80 m round most of the usa knows |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"bradvk2qq" wrote in
oups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. SC |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in groups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:27:14 GMT, "U-Know-Who" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in egroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) with SC stuff iI am too busy holding my nose to be too concerned about nope...you're just too stupid. Stop telling others how to quote. You have no room to criticize. |
KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
|
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
: wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in egroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in legroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you. Cry me a river, Sissy-Boi. |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in glegroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you. ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF. SC |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in oglegroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you. ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF. SC Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on the nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you. Believe me SC, even Mark is above your level of intelligence, spelling included. You are WAY out of your league attempting to debate me. Sure, call me a ****-ant. BFD. Again, and as I have previously informed you, no one, including the FCC, ARRL, _______ ---name your group here, give a rat's ass what you think. Send mail/email to whomever you wish. They'll soon file your garbage in the circular file where it properly belongs. |
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"U-Know-Who" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "U-Know-Who" wrote in : wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in ooglegroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) Nah, you're just stupid and don't read well to begin with. Were you like Mark and rode the short bus to school? That might explain why you're not smart enough to get a real ham license. SC Nah, nothing of the sort. Dumbass ****tards like you are the reason most don't find the motivation to get licensed. No one wants to talk to your ilk. And soon enough, the HF bands will be much better. Hopefully a CB'er with HF privileges will move next door to you. ROFL, You're a hilarious little **** ant. 11 meters is HF. SC Yes, I am hilarious. Sad part is that you are too dense to pick up on the nuances of what I wrote, but then that's typical of you. No, I caught the nuance. You'll be the one wishing things went my way once the bands are rendered useless by less qualified operators. Listen to eleven meters if you want to know what ham radio is going to sound like. SC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com