Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
RadioGuy wrote: In article et, says... Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC I'm not Chris and I don't have no code license you idiot!!!!!!!!!! I'm a General Class and I know code. You're just an idiot! hey chris.........get over here and suck my tits as marqueer runs his tongue on my cock |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article et, says... Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC I'm not Chris and I don't have no code license you idiot!!!!!!!!!! I'm a General Class and I know code. You're just an idiot! Sure, whatever you say Chris. How's your code practice coming along? SC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
bradvk2qq wrote: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ same for the USA as anyone that lisitens to 80 m round most of the usa knows |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
"bradvk2qq" wrote in
oups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. SC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in groups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.
wrote in message ... On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:27:14 GMT, "U-Know-Who" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "bradvk2qq" wrote in egroups.com: Slow Code wrote: Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF. Support keeping CW. Thanks. SC The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams. Your 'filter' didn't work. Brad VK2QQ You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in. don't you knowsc? Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to read. :-) with SC stuff iI am too busy holding my nose to be too concerned about nope...you're just too stupid. Stop telling others how to quote. You have no room to criticize. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | CB | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | General | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Scanner |