Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their
no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and
start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.revisionism
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


wrote:

hey chris.........get over here and suck my tits as marqueer runs his
tongue on my cock




Hello,

Ah, yes. The incessant parasite with his inevitable
preoccupation with hate, body parts and sick sex.

http://www.jewwatch.com



  #6   Report Post  
Old November 5th 06, 01:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their
no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and
start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC


The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams.
Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ

  #7   Report Post  
Old November 5th 06, 02:07 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


bradvk2qq wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get their
no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the internet and
start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC


The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams.
Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


same for the USA as anyone that lisitens to 80 m round most of the usa
knows

  #8   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 01:16 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get
their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the
internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same
thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC


The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams.
Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ



You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.


SC
  #9   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 03:27 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
groups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get
their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the
internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same
thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams.
Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ



You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.

don't you knowsc?


Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to
read. :-)


  #10   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 04:20 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Default Hopefully now you people will see why keeping code is important.


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:27:14 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:11 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

"bradvk2qq" wrote in
egroups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Take for example RadioGuy AKA Chris, and Mark in the Dark. They get
their no-code licenses and what do they do. They show up on the
internet and start crappin. If we eliminate CW, they'll do the same
thing on HF.

Support keeping CW.

Thanks.

SC

The worst troublemakers that we have in VK are all Code licenced Hams.
Your 'filter' didn't work.

Brad VK2QQ


You don't have a CW requirement there anymore. I'm sure the HF bands
there were a lot nicer before you let the no-codes in.

don't you knowsc?


Mark, learn to space above and below your replies. It makes it easier to
read. :-)


with SC stuff iI am too busy holding my nose to be too concerned about
nope...you're just too stupid.
Stop telling others how to quote.
You have no room to criticize.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 10:46 AM
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? [email protected] CB 0 October 31st 06 03:01 AM
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? Slow Code General 1 October 30th 06 02:00 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine CB 188 January 6th 04 06:05 PM
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner DeWayne Scanner 143 November 23rd 03 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017