Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code

Nah, all HF bands are for sale. Lord help the rest of the world after the
FCC finishes their work. People like SC are the reason for this.

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

Slow Code wrote:

If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code

Don't forget the requirement to understand the construction, theory and
maintenance of spark transmitters.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code

No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface
Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help?

KB1NXE

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

"James Philopena" wrote in
news:AL73h.1005$sw6.573@trndny08:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code

No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer
Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does
that help?

KB1NXE


I like it.

SC

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

James Philopena wrote:

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface
Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help?

KB1NXE



It's fine as long as the exam questions are sent in CW :-)

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

Dave wrote in
:

James Philopena wrote:

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer
Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does
that help?

KB1NXE



It's fine as long as the exam questions are sent in CW :-)


Why didn't I think of that.

SC

More Morkie Mularkie
 

wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:04 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Why didn't I think of that.

becuase you don't think

No, Morkie..."not thinking" is YOUR forte, as evidenced by your
posts herein.

Steve, K4YZ

Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
 

Mark In the Dark, wrote in
:

On 5 Nov 2006 22:15:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:04 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Why didn't I think of that.

becuase you don't think

No, Morkie..."not thinking" is YOUR forte, as evidenced by your
posts herein.

hardly y thoughts as always well thought out not always well speled
but then you are too stupid to understand the difference


Stop calling Steve me, Markie. If you Make him mad he's going to drive up
there and slap the crap out of you, but look on the bright side, you won't
have to 'carp' in the backyard anymore.

Learn CW!

SC