Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 12:16 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?



If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


Nah, all HF bands are for sale. Lord help the rest of the world after the
FCC finishes their work. People like SC are the reason for this.


  #3   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 07:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 202
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

Slow Code wrote:

If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


Don't forget the requirement to understand the construction, theory and
maintenance of spark transmitters.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 09:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface
Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help?

KB1NXE


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 11:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

"James Philopena" wrote in
news:AL73h.1005$sw6.573@trndny08:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer
Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does
that help?

KB1NXE



I like it.

SC


  #6   Report Post  
Old November 5th 06, 12:50 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 444
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

James Philopena wrote:

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code



No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface
Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help?

KB1NXE



It's fine as long as the exam questions are sent in CW :-)

  #7   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 01:16 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

Dave wrote in
:

James Philopena wrote:

"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code



No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer
Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does
that help?

KB1NXE



It's fine as long as the exam questions are sent in CW :-)



Why didn't I think of that.

SC
  #8   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 06:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 300
Default More Morkie Mularkie


wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:04 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Why didn't I think of that.


becuase you don't think


No, Morkie..."not thinking" is YOUR forte, as evidenced by your
posts herein.

Steve, K4YZ

  #9   Report Post  
Old November 7th 06, 12:58 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

Mark In the Dark, wrote in
:

On 5 Nov 2006 22:15:53 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:16:04 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Why didn't I think of that.

becuase you don't think


No, Morkie..."not thinking" is YOUR forte, as evidenced by your
posts herein.


hardly y thoughts as always well thought out not always well speled
but then you are too stupid to understand the difference



Stop calling Steve me, Markie. If you Make him mad he's going to drive up
there and slap the crap out of you, but look on the bright side, you won't
have to 'carp' in the backyard anymore.

Learn CW!

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017