Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mo Hoaner wrote:
"David G. Nagel" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: Snipped... It should also state that the device may not emit any interfering signals. Actually, most of the stuff being talked about here is exempted by the FCC from testing. Basically, any digital stuff in appliances, and vehicles is exempt from showing compliance. That doesn't mean it's allowed to cause harmful interference, but the exact definition of "harmful" is a grey area. Dave WD9BDZ Exempt from FCC compliance testing but not from Part 15 compliance. Intentional and Unintentional radiators must comply with Part 15. There is still a permissible level of signal emitted under this Part i.e. Unlicensed two way radios. Dave WD9BDZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trane furnace radio/TV interference | General | |||
Trane furnace radio/TV interference | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
NTIA Claims BPL Could Help Alleviate Power Line Noise | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting |