LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 11:13 PM posted to alt.home.repair,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,alt.hvac
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 183
Default Trane furnace radio/TV interference

Mo Hoaner wrote:
"David G. Nagel" wrote in message
...

Dave wrote:

Snipped...



It should also state that the device may not emit any interfering signals.



Actually, most of the stuff being talked about here is exempted by the FCC
from testing. Basically, any digital stuff in appliances, and vehicles is
exempt from showing compliance. That doesn't mean it's allowed to cause
harmful interference, but the exact definition of "harmful" is a grey area.




Dave WD9BDZ




Exempt from FCC compliance testing but not from Part 15 compliance.
Intentional and Unintentional radiators must comply with Part 15. There
is still a permissible level of signal emitted under this Part i.e.
Unlicensed two way radios.

Dave WD9BDZ


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trane furnace radio/TV interference Mark General 36 November 14th 06 09:41 PM
Trane furnace radio/TV interference Mark Antenna 35 November 13th 06 05:32 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
NTIA Claims BPL Could Help Alleviate Power Line Noise Mike Terry Shortwave 2 June 10th 04 01:12 AM
IBOC interference complaint - advice? WBRW Broadcasting 11 February 11th 04 01:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017