![]() |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote in message ups.com... Show us. I don't usually accept usenet challenges for cites since I have other things to do but what the hey, you seem like a decent guy so I made an exception: §97.3 Definitions. (c) The following terms are used in this Part to indicate emission types. Refer to §2.201 of the FCC Rules, Emission, modulation and transmission characteristics, for information on emission type designators. (1) CW. International Morse code telegraphy emissions having designators with A, C, H, J or R as the first symbol; 1 as the second symbol; A or B as the third symbol; and emissions J2A and J2B. M = Modulation Type N None A AM (Amplitude Modulation), double sideband, full carrier H AM, single sideband, full carrier R AM, single sideband, reduced or controlled carrier J AM, single sideband, suppressed carrier B AM, independent sidebands C AM, vestigial sideband (commonly analog TV) F Angle-modulated, straight FM G Angle-modulated, phase modulation (common; sounds like FM) D Carrier is amplitude and angle modulated P Pulse, no modulation K Pulse, amplitude modulation (PAM, PSM) L Pulse, width modulation (PWM) M Pulse, phase or position modulation (PPM) Q Pulse, carrier also angle-modulated during pulse W Pulse, two or more modes used X All cases not covered above N = Nature of modulating signal 0 None 1 Digital, on-off or quantized, no modulation 2 Digital, with modulation 3 Single analog channel 7 Two or more digital channels 8 Two or more analog channels 9 Composite, one or more digital channel, one or more analog X All cases not covered above I = Information type N None A Aural telegraphy, for people (Morse code) B Telegraphy for machine copy (RTTY, fast Morse) C Analog fax D Data, telemetry, telecommand E Telephony, voice, sound broadcasting F Video, television W Combinations of the above X All cases not covered above Note that, in general, every permitted CW emission is AM and has a "1" in the middle. Note that it must be in Morse (I assume you agreed with that). J2 (SSB) is allowed (for what it's worth) but note that it must be either keyed on/off or quantized (*digital*). Note that in no case is any form analog modulation permitted in the FCC definition. It may only be on/off keyed or "on/off" by digital modulation. Tones are analog transmissions. You cannot use the RTTY "mark" tone as FCC-defined CW. Checkmate. |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:00:44 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:46:39 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... First let me say that, in amateur radio use, the term "CW", when used to mean a mode of radio communication, is universally defined as "Morse Code radiotelegraphy by means of an on-off keyed carrier". The literal "continuous wave" meaning does not apply. Stefan Wolfe wrote: wrote in message ups.com... The big question is whether the signals (keyed carrier vs. keyed audio tone) look different on a spectrum analyzer. If they don't, why should FCC care? I agree that it doesn't matter to the FCC as long is the keyed audio tone is coupled to the radio with EM waves such as with light (optoisolators), RF or wires (electrical connections). However, if you couple the keyed audio carrier acoustically, speaker-to-mike using only sound waves, then that is J3E and only permissible in the voice portion of the band. No, that's just not true - *IF* the rig and tone are clean enough. Problems arise when the tone is not a pure sinusoid, or the transmitter does not have adequate carrier- or unwanted sideband-suppression. But that's not what is being discussed here. Feed a Morse-Code-keyed audio tone that is a pure sinusoid into an SSB transmitter of sufficient quality, and the result is "CW". It doesn't matter how the tone gets into the transmitter, as long as the process doesn't introduce other tones or artifacts. If I were to whistle nearly pure sine waves (I am a good whistler, perhaps you have seen paintings of my mother :-)) in Morse code into the mike input, it might look like CW and sound like CW but it would really be J3E, hence illegal in the CW sub-bands. No, that's not true, unless the whistle isn't a pure sine wave. Using acoustic coupling (J3E), it becomes a slippery slope; first computer generated tones, then human whistling, then humming and before you know it, "talking" (di dah di dah etc.. and finally, "words" :-)) Not a slippery slope at all. All that matters is what it looks like to a spectrum analyzer. If the whistle is a pure sine wave, the output will be a single carrier. But if it's not a pure sine wave, the result will be spectrally different, and illegal. From a regulations standpoint, it does not matter how the signal is generated. What does matter is that it meets the standards of spectrum purity. Now you might argue that a simple "CW" transmitter using keyed Class C stages and vacuum tubes can be much simpler, more electrically efficient, and certainly more elegant than a newfangled computer-SSB-transceiver-kluge-setup, yet deliver a signal of equal quality. That's true - but it's a different issue. I give up. indeed you see his style of deabte evade nit pick and sidestepp avoid anything You keep talking about how the signal looks when it is *received*. I keep talking about how the true A1A signal is supposed to be *transmitted* (your last paragraph is exactly that but you dismissed it). Part 97 is not concerned with how you receive, only how you transmit. even the rules must yeld to "logic" of the ProCoders I agree it is true that you can fool anyone on the receiving end as long as you can make the signal look like A1A on a spectrum analyzer. That might be difficult because the sidebands generated by breaking a CW "square" wave would be present on my A1A transmission and you would somehow have to re-create them on your SSB pure tone transmission that is keyed in your tightly filtered audio circuit. But re-check the definition of A1A and you will see that there is only one way to *transmit* it. And A1A is the only FCC definition of "CW". It is a moot point because tone generated data (as a sinusoidal "mark" in your SSB transmission) is legal everywhere that CW is legal. The same is not true of the voluntary band plans. It it is important to know the difference, even if you think the difference makes no difference so to speak. And I said that whistling CW into the mike is J3E voice, not A1A, and the only thing that separates it from being legal on the CW sub-bands is the way the data is coupled, not how it is received or transmitted. You completely missed all of my points. he is very good at missing points OTOH it is one of the more legit styles used by th e ProCode Luddites on here http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Ummm....surprize, I am not/never was pro-code "test" but I think copying code in one's head once in a while is a good mental exercise. certainly I agree is for those with the talent Do you ever do anything to exercise the mind? sure why do you ask? I have held a rating of expert in chess I am in various types of simulation games read etc but I choose which exercises I choose to induge in The physical analogue would be riding a bicycle. for some rding that bike is an imposible as I find morse Code It has value and can be enjoyable for some but I agree you should not have to pass a bicycle riding test to get an automobile drivers license. indeed However, as a driver, I guess I would be slightly embarrassed if people found out I did not know how to ride a bike ;-)) you know I can't ride bike have not been able to ride one since is day back when Reagan was President and I was injured I in some sense still Know how to ride but I can't do it anymore I can't beat the victim defense. No one ever can. |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 17:46:45 -0800, " wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: As long as there is a single one out there... Sigh...that's about the ONLY thing that justifies their mean way of acting. How do you justify your behavior here, Len? How do you justify your behavior here, Dave? Heil thinks about his rank-title-status and decides he is "better than anybody" who can't do as "good" as himself. Heil is SELF-JUSTIFYING! :-) he is a soiciopth like most of the extras hopefully I can soon let some fresh air into that crowd care to jion me Len? I can hardly wait for that! |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 17:46:45 -0800, " wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: As long as there is a single one out there... Sigh...that's about the ONLY thing that justifies their mean way of acting. How do you justify your behavior here, Len? How do you justify your behavior here, Dave? Heil thinks about his rank-title-status and decides he is "better than anybody" who can't do as "good" as himself. Heil is SELF-JUSTIFYING! :-) he is a soiciopth like most of the extras hopefully I can soon let some fresh air into that crowd care to jion me Len? I can hardly wait for that! it will be chalenge but I have beaten robeson I can handle the extras if I have to |
One way to promote learning of code ...
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: (Michael Black) on Sun, Jan 14 2007 Most of the ready-built "CW" or SSB HF transceivers in use today do that sort of keying. Major reason is keeping the PA at the same bias for all modes selected; makes for a simpler mode selection control. I believe you've made another of your factual errors, Leonard. Collins used to use this method in the KWM-2A. Unfortunately, the company used a 1375 Hz tone--too high for anything but casual CW use. Dave K8MN "Casual CW use???" As Colonel Jessup would say, "Is there any other kind?" |
One way to promote learning of code ...
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Show us. I don't usually accept usenet challenges for cites since I have other things to do but what the hey, you seem like a decent guy so I made an exception: Thank you §97.3 Definitions. (c) The following terms are used in this Part to indicate emission types. Refer to §2.201 of the FCC Rules, Emission, modulation and transmission characteristics, for information on emission type designators. (1) CW. International Morse code telegraphy emissions having designators with A, C, H, J or R as the first symbol; 1 as the second symbol; A or B as the third symbol; and emissions J2A and J2B. M = Modulation Type N None A AM (Amplitude Modulation), double sideband, full carrier H AM, single sideband, full carrier R AM, single sideband, reduced or controlled carrier J AM, single sideband, suppressed carrier B AM, independent sidebands C AM, vestigial sideband (commonly analog TV) F Angle-modulated, straight FM G Angle-modulated, phase modulation (common; sounds like FM) D Carrier is amplitude and angle modulated P Pulse, no modulation K Pulse, amplitude modulation (PAM, PSM) L Pulse, width modulation (PWM) M Pulse, phase or position modulation (PPM) Q Pulse, carrier also angle-modulated during pulse W Pulse, two or more modes used X All cases not covered above N = Nature of modulating signal 0 None 1 Digital, on-off or quantized, no modulation 2 Digital, with modulation 3 Single analog channel 7 Two or more digital channels 8 Two or more analog channels 9 Composite, one or more digital channel, one or more analog X All cases not covered above I = Information type N None A Aural telegraphy, for people (Morse code) B Telegraphy for machine copy (RTTY, fast Morse) C Analog fax D Data, telemetry, telecommand E Telephony, voice, sound broadcasting F Video, television W Combinations of the above X All cases not covered above Note that, in general, every permitted CW emission is AM and has a "1" in the middle. If we're talking about the non-voice parts of the AM bands, I agree. Frequency-shift Morse is allowed elsewhere but that's a different issue. Note that it must be in Morse (I assume you agreed with that). Other codes are allowed, but if they are used, the designation is different because they are considered data modes. J2 (SSB) is allowed (for what it's worth) but note that it must be either keyed on/off or quantized (*digital*). Note that in no case is any form analog modulation permitted in the FCC definition. It may only be on/off keyed or "on/off" by digital modulation. Agreed - but that on-off keying may be accomplished in any way that results in the transmitted signal meeting the requirements. Tones are analog transmissions. You cannot use the RTTY "mark" tone as FCC-defined CW. Not if there's also a space tone. But that's not what's being discussed. If you have an SSB transmitter of good quality (meaning good carrier and unwanted sideband suppression), and you feed a sine wave audio tone into the audio input, the resulting RF output is a single carrier frequency. If you then turn the audio tone on and off with Morse Code timing, the result is a Morse Code keyed RF carrier that is no different than a Morse Code keyed RF carrier generated any other way. In the cited regulations, I see no mention of how the signal is generated, only what the resulting RF output characteristics are. Checkmate. By whom? ;-) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: (Michael Black) on Sun, Jan 14 2007 Most of the ready-built "CW" or SSB HF transceivers in use today do that sort of keying. Major reason is keeping the PA at the same bias for all modes selected; makes for a simpler mode selection control. I believe you've made another of your factual errors, Leonard. Collins used to use this method in the KWM-2A. Unfortunately, the company used a 1375 Hz tone--too high for anything but casual CW use. Dave K8MN "Casual CW use???" As Colonel Jessup would say, "Is there any other kind?" today certainly CW as once used seriously but harly in what 50 years |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote:
wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 17:46:45 -0800, " wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: As long as there is a single one out there... Sigh...that's about the ONLY thing that justifies their mean way of acting. How do you justify your behavior here, Len? How do you justify your behavior here, Dave? Heil thinks about his rank-title-status and decides he is "better than anybody" who can't do as "good" as himself. Heil is SELF-JUSTIFYING! :-) he is a soiciopth like most of the extras hopefully I can soon let some fresh air into that crowd care to jion me Len? I can hardly wait for that! Brian, I've said it before and I'll say it again: My advocacy was for the elimination of the code test for any US amateur radio license. Since that is almost a legal fact, I won't be bothering the happy little in-group of middle-aged-crisis morse mavens that the moderated group evidences becoming. I find NO joy in keeping up the farcical fantasy of amateur radio constantly recreating "pioneer" times in radio a half century after the actual pioneering...or, worse yet, their idea that having a radio hobby is somehow "serving their country." The way that most of the morsemen act is like the re-enacters of old battles such as the American Civil War...AS IF they are the "generals" who - this time - will ensure that the South won, not lost. :-( [in their minds maybe, but not in reality] I've found that ALL of electronics ("radio" is a subset of that) is a fascinating subject and still find it so. By itself. I don't need some "national organization" to tell me so or pump up my wish-fulfillment. There's an infinity more yet to come as the technology continues to evolve. I'll keep on with that. Those that strive for Control, for putting up a facade of being "better" at ancient skills, can go have their opinion orgasms in a tight little enclave of elite "gods of radio" full of "contests" and exhortations of "mastering" morse (because they think they did) and all "should" be nearly as good as they are. ...just waiting for FCC 06-178 to become legal law... |
One way to promote learning of code ...
wrote: wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 17:46:45 -0800, " wrote: hopefully I can soon let some fresh air into that crowd care to jion me Len? I can hardly wait for that! Brian, I've said it before and I'll say it again: prehaps you miss understood whcih gruop I was inviting you to join me in letting a bit a fresh air into I meant the extra class ONair I certianly will not bother the "moderated" gruop if it happens |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com