| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
January 15th 07, 02:10 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: I see nothing about this being a demoracy. Nope, no demoracy here. which is JUST the way you want it Dave Heil Dave! You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you. And you wonder why people think you're a prick. Actually, I don't wonder that. You should. I do understand that you do. I can live with that. You'll have to. You've been made to look foolish because you didn't recognize your own error. As you are fond of writing about me, you've stumbled and skinned your knee on your own mistake. I don't consider the rare typo to be worth stumbling over. Apparently you do. Your "Heil Dave!" comment didn't work with your "demoracy" and now you feel the need to lash out. Have you applied for spelling cop in the new group? Go figure! Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization. Dave K8MN Best of Luck. |
|
#13
January 15th 07, 05:16 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: I see nothing about this being a demoracy. Nope, no demoracy here. which is JUST the way you want it Dave Heil Dave! You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you. And you wonder why people think you're a prick. Actually, I don't wonder that. You should. I don't believe so, hot-ham-and-cheese. As long as the folks who have a problem with me are you, Mark Morgan, Leonard Anderson and the demented Roger Wiseman, I'm not going to worry about it. I do understand that you do. I can live with that. You'll have to. I'm not under some sort of compulsion to do so. I can live comfortably with it. You've been made to look foolish because you didn't recognize your own error. As you are fond of writing about me, you've stumbled and skinned your knee on your own mistake. I don't consider the rare typo to be worth stumbling over. Apparently you do. It is apparent that you didn't recognize it when you wrote it and didn't recognize it when I wrote it. Your "Heil Dave!" comment didn't work with your "demoracy" and now you feel the need to lash out. Have you applied for spelling cop in the new group? Would you have us believe that your "Heil Dave!" comment was written in response to the term "demoracy"? Go figure! Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization. Best of Luck. The proposed new newsgroup should take care of most of the demented, those who can't stick with a topic and those who lack self-control. How long would you give anyone who writes "Sister Nun of the Above" or "koks on parade" in the new group? Dave K8MN |
|
#14
January 15th 07, 08:57 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: I see nothing about this being a demoracy. Nope, no demoracy here. which is JUST the way you want it Dave Heil Dave! You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you. And you wonder why people think you're a prick. Actually, I don't wonder that. You should. I don't believe so, hot-ham-and-cheese. As long as the folks who have a problem with me are you, Mark Morgan, Leonard Anderson and the demented Roger Wiseman, I'm not going to worry about it. I didn't suggest that you worry about it. There is a difference between wondering about something and worrying about it. Do you agree? I do understand that you do. I can live with that. You'll have to. I'm not under some sort of compulsion to do so. You have no choice. I think you're a prick. I can live comfortably with it. The only thing that can change my mind is you, and I'm confident that you won't. So you'll just have to live with it, comfortably if you must, for a long, long time. You've been made to look foolish because you didn't recognize your own error. As you are fond of writing about me, you've stumbled and skinned your knee on your own mistake. I don't consider the rare typo to be worth stumbling over. Apparently you do. It is apparent that you didn't recognize it when you wrote it and didn't recognize it when I wrote it. Yeh? Does that mean that I am incapable of holding the Roanoke Division Director position or some other position of leadership? What was it you said about people's spelling; then almost immediately posted with a misspelled word? Sheesh. You could learn a thing or two from yourself. Like quit playing spelling cop. Your "Heil Dave!" comment didn't work with your "demoracy" and now you feel the need to lash out. Have you applied for spelling cop in the new group? Would you have us believe that your "Heil Dave!" comment was written in response to the term "demoracy"? Anything -but- democracy. It was written in the spirit of 1930's Germany. Get it? Go figure! Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization. Best of Luck. The proposed new newsgroup should take care of most of the demented, those who can't stick with a topic and those who lack self-control. I imagine they will allow your prickish comments through, unabated. How long would you give anyone who writes "Sister Nun of the Above" or "koks on parade" in the new group? Dave K8MN Why ask me? I'm not a moderator, and you'll have a helluva time getting an answer from one of them. Best of Luck with it, though. |
|
#15
January 15th 07, 10:53 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 12:57:05 -0800, wrote: Dave Heil wrote: The proposed new newsgroup should take care of most of the demented, those who can't stick with a topic and those who lack self-control. I imagine they will allow your prickish comments through, unabated. I gave the test people one of dave posts with the nam polished off they did rejuect it Are they rejecting everything you send in? Or maybe Heil could take a lesson that his present posting style is unacceptable. How long would you give anyone who writes "Sister Nun of the Above" or "koks on parade" in the new group? Dave K8MN Why ask me? I'm not a moderator, and you'll have a helluva time getting an answer from one of them. indeed It's up to Heil to try to get answers to his questions. |
|
#16
January 16th 07, 05:27 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
wrote:
wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 12:57:05 -0800, wrote: Dave Heil wrote: The proposed new newsgroup should take care of most of the demented, those who can't stick with a topic and those who lack self-control. I imagine they will allow your prickish comments through, unabated. I gave the test people one of dave posts with the nam polished off they did rejuect it Are they rejecting everything you send in? Or maybe Heil could take a lesson that his present posting style is unacceptable. I didn't make a test post. Mark says he did, using my words. It seems that Mark submits off-topic material and it gets rejected. A sharper guy would get the message. Mark continues to try pounding the square peg into the round hole. How long would you give anyone who writes "Sister Nun of the Above" or "koks on parade" in the new group? Why ask me? I'm not a moderator, and you'll have a helluva time getting an answer from one of them. indeed It's up to Heil to try to get answers to his questions. It should be quickly obvious that Wiseman's filth-o-grams won't make it through and that a lengthy string of Mark's "gte hlep" posts will not appear. Dave K8MN |
|
#17
January 16th 07, 11:55 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2007 12:57:05 -0800, wrote: Dave Heil wrote: The proposed new newsgroup should take care of most of the demented, those who can't stick with a topic and those who lack self-control. I imagine they will allow your prickish comments through, unabated. I gave the test people one of dave posts with the nam polished off they did rejuect it Are they rejecting everything you send in? Or maybe Heil could take a lesson that his present posting style is unacceptable. I didn't make a test post. Mark says he did, using my words. It seems that Mark submits off-topic material and it gets rejected. A sharper guy would get the message. Mark continues to try pounding the square peg into the round hole. That's one explanation. Perhaps the subject matter of your posts is unacceptable to the new newsgroup? How long would you give anyone who writes "Sister Nun of the Above" or "koks on parade" in the new group? Why ask me? I'm not a moderator, and you'll have a helluva time getting an answer from one of them. indeed It's up to Heil to try to get answers to his questions. It should be quickly obvious that Wiseman's filth-o-grams won't make it through and that a lengthy string of Mark's "gte hlep" posts will not appear. Dave K8MN Good Luck on getting your own posting through. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated | Info | |||
| RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated | General | |||
| VOTE, Moderated or Free Speech? | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
