Dean M wrote:
I would certainly agree with you BUT what his niblets was doing was not
being discriminating, far from he. He invited comments then refused to post
any of those that he did not approve of.

That doesn't meet the definition of "censorship".
It is very difficult for a private citizen who is
not employed or appointed by the government to
engage in "censorship".

Editors of newspapers invite letters to the editors
and then refuse to publish them. That's not
"censorship".

QEX invites articles to be submitted and then refuses
to publish them after agreeing to publish them. That's
not censorship.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com